• Re: MUTIL request

    From wkitty42@46:1/132 to Gryphon on Thu May 5 17:35:28 2016
    On 04/26/16, Gryphon said the following...

    If I do that it will break new file scans.

    How so? If 10 files get added (via file copy or ftp upload or binkp copy), one each over the next 10 days, then you run the massupload, it will look as if each of those 10 files were added on the same day. Whereas if you run a massupload with the file date rather than the run date, you will have a true date stamp for the file in the file list.

    FWIW: RA has three dates in its files directory... the file's actual date,
    the upload date and the last download date... part of my processing is to ensure that the file's actual date is as accurate as possible because some files when transferred with some methods get the date of download instead of carrying the original date... i fix them by setting the file's date to the newest of the internal files in the archive... some dates are irrevocibly
    lost for files that are not archives or that i cannot look inside of...

    --- Mystic BBS v1.10 A57 (Windows)
    * Origin: (46:1/132)
  • From Accession@46:1/100 to wkitty42 on Thu May 5 18:40:06 2016
    Hello wkitty42,

    On 05 May 16 17:35, wkitty42 wrote to Gryphon:

    FWIW: RA has three dates in its files directory... the file's actual
    date, the upload date and the last download date... part of my
    processing is to ensure that the file's actual date is as accurate as possible because some files when transferred with some methods get the date of download instead of carrying the original date... i fix them
    by setting the file's date to the newest of the internal files in the archive... some dates are irrevocibly lost for files that are not
    archives or that i cannot look inside of...

    Yeah, but RA is so ugly to look at. :) :) :)

    Regards,
    Nick

    --- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-b20160322
    * Origin: thePharcyde_ telnet://bbs.pharcyde.org (Wisconsin) (46:1/100)
  • From Tiny@46:1/126.1 to Accession on Fri May 6 16:50:22 2016
    Accession wrote in a message to wkitty42:

    Yeah, but RA is so ugly to look at. :) :) :)

    I've seen some killer customized Remote Access systems over the years. Hell my own (I wish I still had it) looked like PCBoard more then RA.

    Though I do love the interface of the RA style boards, (Hence my love for Ezycom I guess!)

    Shawn
    ... An argument is where two people are trying to get the LAST word in FIRST! ---
    * Origin: Tiny's Trailer (46:1/126.1)
  • From wkitty42@46:1/132 to Accession on Sat May 7 20:58:03 2016
    On 05/05/16, Accession said the following...

    FWIW: RA has three dates in its files directory... the file's actual date, the upload date and the last download date... part of my processing is to ensure that the file's actual date is as accurate as possible because some files when transferred with some methods get th date of download instead of carrying the original date... i fix them by setting the file's date to the newest of the internal files in the archive... some dates are irrevocibly lost for files that are not archives or that i cannot look inside of...

    Yeah, but RA is so ugly to look at. :) :) :)

    so change it just like you do mystic or synchronet... no ""mods"" needed ;)

    --- Mystic BBS v1.10 A57 (Windows)
    * Origin: (46:1/132)
  • From g00r00@46:1/127 to wkitty42 on Fri May 6 16:40:16 2016
    FWIW: RA has three dates in its files directory... the file's actual
    date, the upload date and the last download date... part of my

    Mystic has these file dates too.

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A13 (Windows)
    * Origin: Sector 7 [Mystic BBS WHQ] (46:1/127)