• ArakNet dead?

    From Knight Shadow@46:1/145 to All on Tue Sep 8 07:28:45 2026
    Is this net essentially dead? I don't see much activity at all for a long time in practically all the bases. I also applied for my board, but haven't heard anything in ages.

    I also saw another SysOp drop it due to inactivity citing the same. I guess its us users who keep the message bases going, but was just curious.

    |08[|07K|08N1GHT|07S|08HAD0W] |08[|07https|08://|07www|08.|07boneyard|08-|07bbs|08.|07com|08]

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A47 2021/12/25 (Windows/32)
    * Origin: d i s t o r t i o n // d1st.org (46:1/145)
  • From Accession@46:1/100 to Knight Shadow on Tue Sep 8 17:05:56 2026
    Hey Knight!

    On Tue, 08 Sep 2026 07:28:44 -0700, you wrote:

    First, your subject is "Araknet". This is Agoranet. Which one are you referring to here?

    Is this net essentially dead? I don't see much activity at all for a
    long time in practically all the bases.

    It wouldn't be dead if people like you (and others) contributed! There has been about 10 applicants in the past 2 weeks (your last email to us was 8/14), and not a single one has posted a message besides maybe one or two test messages in the area designated for it. There's a huge difference between sysops that collect message networks, and sysops that actually participate in them; and to give you a small inkling of what I mean.. there's over 100 systems connected to this network. ;(

    I also applied for my board, but haven't heard anything in ages.

    Here was the last mail you sent to both Andrew and me:

    "Actually wait. I'm HOLD aren't I. So that wouldn't be the issue. Ok I'll stop blowing up your inbox. I'll go dig and figure out what I'm missing."

    Have you figured out the issue yet? Looks like you've already been setup as 46:10/200. If I remember correctly, after that mail you figured out that you messed something up copy/pasting your areas.. or am I thinking of someone else?

    I also saw another SysOp drop it due to inactivity citing the same.

    Was that for Araknet or Agoranet? I'm still confused by your subject of the message I'm replying to. Did you ask that sysop if he was contributing anything useful (or even remotely trying) before dropping whatever network he was referring to?

    I guess its us users who keep the message bases going, but was just
    curious.

    It most definitely is. Agoranet was pretty active before other networks came around and veered the activity elsewhere. It happens. If you want to save what networks are left, sysops need to contribute to them.. rather than collect them to beef up their stats on their BBS ads.. which then gets actual users interested in contributing, too.

    Regards,
    Nick

    ... Sarcasm: because beating people up is illegal.
    --- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-b20260905
    * Origin: _thePharcyde telnet://bbs.pharcyde.org (Wisconsin) (46:1/100)
  • From Knight Shadow@46:10/200 to Accession on Tue Sep 8 21:33:31 2026
    First, your subject is "Araknet". This is Agoranet. Which one are you referring to here?

    Sorry, this was actually a case of the Mondays (on a Tuesday). So I MEANT to post that in Araknet General, but I was in Agoranet General (they looked similar I guess when half asleep). But after I sent it, I hoped maybe just the title having mentioned Araknet would get me by, but I really should have sent a follow up message to clarify. Sigh.

    So my bad, I did NOT mean Agoranet, Agoranet is just fine. You guys helped me a ton getting my side of things working for Agoranet.

    Sorry mates. Araknet.

    |08[|07K|08N1GHT|07S|08HAD0W] |08[|07https|08://|07www|08.|07boneyard|08-|07bbs|08.|07com|08]

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 2024/05/29 (Windows/64)
    * Origin: The Boneyard @ boneyard-bbs.com:8073 (SSH:8074) (46:10/200)
  • From Knight Shadow@46:10/200 to Accession on Tue Sep 8 21:37:48 2026
    It most definitely is. Agoranet was pretty active before other networks came around and veered the activity elsewhere. It happens. If you want
    to save what networks are left, sysops need to contribute to them..
    rather than collect them to beef up their stats on their BBS ads.. which then gets actual users interested in contributing, too.

    AND, you are 100% correct about this. I'll take this as a call to action, if I'm going to be a part of a net, I need to contribute to it. We (SysOps) all should.

    |08[|07K|08N1GHT|07S|08HAD0W] |08[|07https|08://|07www|08.|07boneyard|08-|07bbs|08.|07com|08]

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 2024/05/29 (Windows/64)
    * Origin: The Boneyard @ boneyard-bbs.com:8073 (SSH:8074) (46:10/200)
  • From nelgin@46:1/194 to Accession on Wed Sep 9 02:26:58 2026
    On Tue, 8 Sep 2026 17:05:56 -0500
    "Accession" (46:1/100) <Accession@f100.n1.z46.fidonet> wrote:

    Hey Knight!

    On Tue, 08 Sep 2026 07:28:44 -0700, you wrote:

    First, your subject is "Araknet". This is Agoranet. Which one are you referring to here?

    Is this net essentially dead? I don't see much activity at all for
    a long time in practically all the bases.

    It wouldn't be dead if people like you (and others) contributed!
    There has been about 10 applicants in the past 2 weeks (your last
    email to us was 8/14), and not a single one has posted a message
    besides maybe one or two test messages in the area designated for it.
    There's a huge difference between sysops that collect message
    networks, and sysops that actually participate in them; and to give
    you a small inkling of what I mean.. there's over 100 systems
    connected to this network. ;(

    It's pretty much the same for any network, it doesn't matter in the
    board carriers 2 networks or 20 networks. They're all quiet due to lack
    of participation. A sysop can drive only so much traffic. It really
    needs users to step up on post and keep conversations going.


    It most definitely is. Agoranet was pretty active before other
    networks came around and veered the activity elsewhere. It happens.
    If you want to save what networks are left, sysops need to contribute
    to them.. rather than collect them to beef up their stats on their
    BBS ads.. which then gets actual users interested in contributing,
    too.


    My board has 21 networks and I'm wondering when you last saw me
    advertise my BBS?
    --
    End Of The Line BBS - Plano, TX
    telnet endofthelinebbs.com 23
    --- SBBSecho 3.37-Linux
    * Origin: End Of The Line BBS - endofthelinebbs.com (46:1/194)
  • From Accession@46:1/100 to Knight Shadow on Wed Sep 9 17:43:06 2026
    Hey Knight!

    On Tue, Sep 08 2026 21:33:30 -0700, you wrote:

    Sorry, this was actually a case of the Mondays (on a Tuesday). So I MEANT to post that in Araknet General, but I was in Agoranet General (they looked similar I guess when half asleep). But after I sent it, I hoped maybe just the title having mentioned Araknet would get me by, but I really should have sent a follow up message to clarify. Sigh.

    I know exactly what you mean. You would think that you can escape the case of the Mondays when it's a holiday, but it just follows you to the next day.

    So my bad, I did NOT mean Agoranet, Agoranet is just fine. You guys
    helped me a ton getting my side of things working for Agoranet.

    Sorry mates. Araknet.

    No worries, but what I said still applies as far as getting some conversation going here! ;)

    Is Araknet even still a thing? Or did you do the "2.0" version in hopes that months of the original guy screwing over his own network would bring back a bunch of active participants?

    Regards,
    Accession

    ... Take my advice, I don't use it anyway.
    --- AmberEdit/linux 0.8.1
    * Origin: thePharcyde_ telnet://bbs.pharcyde.org (Wisconsin) (46:1/100)
  • From Accession@46:1/100 to Knight Shadow on Wed Sep 9 17:46:32 2026
    Hey Knight!

    On Tue, Sep 08 2026 21:37:48 -0700, you wrote:

    AND, you are 100% correct about this. I'll take this as a call to action, if I'm going to be a part of a net, I need to contribute to it. We (SysOps) all should.

    I agree completely! I'm at fault, too. While I may run the network, I don't have multiple topics to bring up daily to try to keep everyone interested. It's definitely a "team effort" thing.

    Regards,
    Accession

    ... Take my advice, I don't use it anyway.
    --- AmberEdit/linux 0.8.1
    * Origin: thePharcyde_ telnet://bbs.pharcyde.org (Wisconsin) (46:1/100)
  • From Accession@46:1/100 to nelgin on Wed Sep 9 17:49:12 2026
    Hey nelgin!

    On Wed, Sep 09 2026 02:26:58 -0500, you wrote:

    It's pretty much the same for any network, it doesn't matter in the board carriers 2 networks or 20 networks. They're all quiet due to lack of participation. A sysop can drive only so much traffic. It really needs users to step up on post and keep conversations going.

    Very true. Unfortunately, these days there's more sysops than there are users. So if the sysops aren't doing anything active, neither will the users.

    My board has 21 networks and I'm wondering when you last saw me advertise my BBS?
    --
    End Of The Line BBS - Plano, TX
    telnet endofthelinebbs.com 23

    Every time you post a message it's right there in your signature! ;)

    Regards,
    Accession

    ... Take my advice, I don't use it anyway.
    --- AmberEdit/linux 0.8.1
    * Origin: thePharcyde_ telnet://bbs.pharcyde.org (Wisconsin) (46:1/100)
  • From Knight Shadow@46:10/200 to Accession on Wed Sep 9 19:48:36 2026
    Is Araknet even still a thing? Or did you do the "2.0" version in hopes that months of the original guy screwing over his own network would
    bring back a bunch of active participants?

    Interesting! I have no idea the history of it, but now I'm curious :)

    I saw Araknet on some other boards so figured it was still active. Then I found the Reign of Fire BBS and saw there was an application there so I submitted it but didn't hear anything back. So maybe its dead I guess? I also saw in post recently someone shared a google sheets document with a "master list" of echonets and there were some in red that I suppose are dead (there was DixieNet in red which I think I heard was dead so assumed red meant dead) and Araknet was in red. Maybe not worth it for me at this point to pursue.

    |08[|07K|08N1GHT|07S|08HAD0W] |08[|07https|08://|07www|08.|07boneyard|08-|07bbs|08.|07com|08]

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 2024/05/29 (Windows/64)
    * Origin: The Boneyard @ boneyard-bbs.com:8073 (SSH:8074) (46:10/200)
  • From nelgin@46:1/194 to Accession on Thu Sep 10 00:46:39 2026
    Re: Re: ArakNet dead?
    By: Accession to nelgin on Wed Sep 09 2026 17:49:12

    Every time you post a message it's right there in your signature! ;)

    hardly an advertisement.
    --- SBBSecho 3.37-Linux
    * Origin: End Of The Line BBS - endofthelinebbs.com (46:1/194)
  • From Exodus@46:1/109 to Knight Shadow on Thu Sep 10 12:28:12 2026
    I saw Araknet on some other boards so figured it was still active. Then I

    You thought wrong then.

    submitted it but didn't hear anything back. So maybe its dead I guess? I al

    Almost 2 years now.

    was DixieNet in red which I think I heard was dead so assumed red meant dea and Araknet was in red. Maybe not worth it for me at this point to pursue.

    MetroNet (my Renegade BBS Support network) has been around since 1994. You can find it on www.rgbbs.info website. Not real active anymore, but was in its hayday.

    --- Renegade vY2Ka2
    * Origin: Joey, do you like movies about gladiators? (46:1/109)
  • From Accession@46:1/100 to Knight Shadow on Thu Sep 10 21:11:44 2026
    Hey Knight!

    On Wed, Sep 09 2026 19:48:36 -0700, you wrote:

    I saw Araknet on some other boards so figured it was still active. Then I found the Reign of Fire BBS and saw there was an application there so I submitted it but didn't hear anything back. So maybe its dead I guess? I also saw in post recently someone shared a google sheets document with a "master list" of echonets and there were some in red that I suppose are dead (there was DixieNet in red which I think I heard was dead so assumed red meant dead) and Araknet was in red. Maybe not worth it for me at this point to pursue.

    The original is gone. The one hosted by Reign of Fire is the "2.0" or whatever. If you sent an application to his email or via netmail, he probably didn't get it. I've been trying to reach him for weeks for Fidonet related things. I finally let him know that both of those methods don't seem to be working on some Fidonet echo he had posted on.

    Regards,
    Accession

    ... Take my advice, I don't use it anyway.
    --- AmberEdit/linux 0.8.1
    * Origin: thePharcyde_ telnet://bbs.pharcyde.org (Wisconsin) (46:1/100)