The following is more recent, and quite interesting:
https://www.wired.co.uk/article/sweden-cashless-society
You know, when they said that operating in cash is more expensive for retailers, I was WTF????!!!!
I mean, credit card processors charge for transactions, PayPal charges for transactions, etc etc etc. I am not buying the idea that their fees are lower than the alleged cost of the 30 seconds it takes to deal change to a customer. Specially in small family stores that are unlikely to be full of customers or build queues at all.
I agree that cash is conveniently easy to steal, but then lots of wares in stores also are. Besides, going cashless does not make money harder to steal. It only makes it easier to steal by governments and banks.
--
gopher://gopher.operationalsecurity.es
Some people get away with strange justifications and excuses. I remember reading an article in the new, which was trying to
prop up and justify the housing bubble, which had some rationale for why rising house prices actually made housing more
affordable to purchase.
Arelor wrote to Dennisk <=-rea
Re: Re: Cashless society is bad.
By: Dennisk to Arelor on Thu Jul 09 2020 06:37 pm
Some people get away with strange justifications and excuses. I remember
ding an article in the new, which was trying torisi
prop up and justify the housing bubble, which had some rationale for why
ng house prices actually made housing more
affordable to purchase.
Hmmm.... so how do they make the argument that rising prices makes
things more affordable, exactly? You made me curious...
Arelor wrote to Dennisk <=-
Re: Re: Cashless society is bad.
By: Dennisk to Arelor on Thu Jul 09 2020 06:37 pm
Some people get away with strange justifications and excuses. I rememberrea
ding an article in the new, which was trying torisi
prop up and justify the housing bubble, which had some rationale for why
ng house prices actually made housing more
affordable to purchase.
Hmmm.... so how do they make the argument that rising prices makes things more affordable, exactly? You made me curious...
From what I remember, the argument was that owning a house was a better financial proposition than renting in the long run,
I think they included the ability to use equity from your rising house price to purchase an investment property, which would
make more money.
They crunched the numbers, and found that because it was better and better for investors, that this means its more affordabl
They completely ignored the problem of buying a house in the first place, and like most in the Real Estate industry here, th
forget that houses exist for people to live in, not to use as speculative tools.
... MultiMail, the new multi-platform, multi-format offline reader!
Re: Re: Cashless society is b
By: Dennisk to Arelor on Sun Jul 12 2020 11:56 am
They crunched the numbers, and found that because it was better and better for investors, that this means its more affordabl
They completely ignored the problem of buying a house in the first place, and like most in the Real Estate industry here, th
forget that houses exist for people to live in, not to use as speculative tools.
Hehe, I see.
Whether to buy or rent seems to be a very cultural thing. Cultures where people switches jobs quite fast because they are
always looking for somethign better seem to tend to rent; sedentary styled ones seem to prefer purchase.
Here we have been having something we call "renting with purchase rights", which means that you rent the house, and it at some
point you want to buy it, they take a big percentage of the rent you have already paid from the final price of the house.
...They completely ignored the problem of buying a house in the first
place, and like most in the Real Estate industry here, they forget that houses exist for people to live in, not to use as speculative tools.
Whether to buy or rent seems to be a very cultural thing. Cultures where peo switches jobs quite fast because they are always looking for somethign bette seem to tend to rent; sedentary styled ones seem to prefer purchase.
Here we have been having something we call "renting with purchase rights", which means that you rent the house, and it at some point you want to buy it they take a big percentage of the rent you have already paid from the final price of the house.
some people say it's better to buy than rent. think of it this way, stuff can go wrong with a house and that can be pretty expensive. also you can get neighbors you hate and you have to deal with their shit.
i lived in a house where a neighbor had a party every day of the week. they were up late and it was constant noise and they would burn nasty ass wood all the time which got inside our windows if we had it open.
they had people pissing on our house and our fense and like 15 people standing on the sidewalk out front. always staring at US whenever we left the house or came home. so fucking annoying.
that was at my ex gf's house. we split everything but stuff was always going wrong with it and i was always buying stuff to fix the house up. it got pretty expensive.
right now i'm renting a 2,000sq foot house with another woman and too many cats and we had the water heater go out. we called the landlord and he had a new one in the next day. i never see him and we pay him and he stays happy.
if i dont like where i am, i just move when the lease is up. it's that easy.
On 07-12-20 03:54, Arelor wrote to Dennisk <=-
Whether to buy or rent seems to be a very cultural thing. Cultures
where people switches jobs quite fast because they are always looking
for somethign better seem to tend to rent; sedentary styled ones seem
to prefer purchase.
Here we have been having something we call "renting with purchase
rights", which means that you rent the house, and it at some point you want to buy it, they take a big percentage of the rent you have already paid from the final price of the house.
On 07-12-20 11:51, Ogg wrote to All <=-
That is why some young hopefuls would buy a "fixer upper", live in it while fixing it, and then hope to sell with a good return on
investment?
That too can be a dubious undertaking. The home-owner would probably
still rely on outside income to support the cost of the "fixing".
Some people overcome "the problem of buying a house in the first place"
by convincing the seller to finance that home.
Re: Re: Cashless society is b
By: MRO to Arelor on Sun Jul 12 2020 01:35 pm
some people say it's better to buy than rent. think of it this way, stu can go wrong with a house and that can be pretty expensive. also you ca get neighbors you hate and you have to deal with their shit.
i lived in a house where a neighbor had a party every day of the week. they were up late and it was constant noise and they would burn nasty a wood all the time which got inside our windows if we had it open.
they had people pissing on our house and our fense and like 15 people standing on the sidewalk out front. always staring at US whenever we le the house or came home. so fucking annoying.
It seems like that type of thing could happen anywhere, whether you buy or r
the side of me sometimes liked to play loud music and apparently had their
knock on their door late at night and ask them to quiet down, and another n e went in and asked them to keep quiet, and they were quiet for about a week de my bedroom and they'd start up the truck at around 5:30AM and let it run
that was at my ex gf's house. we split everything but stuff was always going wrong with it and i was always buying stuff to fix the house up. got pretty expensive.
right now i'm renting a 2,000sq foot house with another woman and too m cats and we had the water heater go out. we called the landlord and he a new one in the next day. i never see him and we pay him and he stays happy.
if i dont like where i am, i just move when the lease is up. it's that easy.
Yeah, spending money to fix stuff is definitely one thing I don't like about
Nightfox
they had people pissing on our house and our fense and like 15 people standing on the sidewalk out front. always staring at US whenever we le the house or came home. so fucking annoying.
It seems like that type of thing could happen anywhere, whether you buy or r or live in a house or apartment or whatever. One time I lived in an apartme
apparently had their stereo right next to the wall connecting with my apartment, and I could hear loud bass even into the bedroom, sometimes at 2- when it would wake me up. One time I went out to knock on their door late a
outside my bedroom and they'd start up the truck at around 5:30AM and let it run for about 20 minutes before leaving. So I was usually woken up at 5:30A by that.
At least when you own a house, you decide how it gets fixed. As a homeowner you might buy a higher ranked or higher output water heater than a landlord uld replace. Same would apply with heating or water conditioning. As a homeowner I can make decisions regarding paint schemes and changes I could not do if I was renting. For example, I can drill holes and run cable for n work drops or video cameras. I could relamp the house and change out older light fixtures or modify a walk-in closet to act as a safe room or security room. Any changes made to a rental have to be reversible or will not provid a return in investment when you move on. Any improvements to a house add to it's resale value if done right.
Where I am, renting can be a bit insecure. I have had one instance of the owner wanting to move back into their house, so had to vacate within 30 days of receiving that notice. Though once you've been in a rental for a while and the agent and landlord are happy with the inspections, chances are you'll be fairly secure in the long term.
Arelor wrote to Dennisk <=-finan
@VIA: VERT/PALANT
@MSGID: <5F0ACFDA.1778.dove-debate@palantirbbs.ddns.net>
@REPLY: <5F0A718C.931.dove-debate@mindseye.ddns.net>
Re: Re: Cashless society is b
By: Dennisk to Arelor on Sun Jul 12 2020 11:56 am
Arelor wrote to Dennisk <=-
Re: Re: Cashless society is bad.
By: Dennisk to Arelor on Thu Jul 09 2020 06:37 pm
Some people get away with strange justifications and excuses. I rememberrea
ding an article in the new, which was trying torisi
prop up and justify the housing bubble, which had some rationale for why
ng house prices actually made housing more
affordable to purchase.
Hmmm.... so how do they make the argument that rising prices makes things more affordable, exactly? You made me curious...
From what I remember, the argument was that owning a house was a better
cial proposition than renting in the long run,fo
I think they included the ability to use equity from your rising house price
to purchase an investment property, which would
make more money.
They crunched the numbers, and found that because it was better and better
r investors, that this means its more affordabland
They completely ignored the problem of buying a house in the first place,
like most in the Real Estate industry here, thtoo
forget that houses exist for people to live in, not to use as speculative
ls.
... MultiMail, the new multi-platform, multi-format offline reader!
Hehe, I see.
Whether to buy or rent seems to be a very cultural thing. Cultures
where people switches jobs quite fast because they are always looking
for somethign better seem to tend to rent; sedentary styled ones seem
to prefer purchase.
Here we have been having something we call "renting with purchase
rights", which means that you rent the house, and it at some point you want to buy it, they take a big percentage of the rent you have already paid from the final price of the house.
PAULIE420 wrote to UTOPIAN GALT <=-
@VIA: PAULIE42
@MSGID: <5F02C7D8.984.dove-debate@americanpibbs.com>
@REPLY: <5F0208A4.53613.dove-deb@vert.synchro.net>
Re: Cashless society is bad.
By: Utopian Galt to All on Sat Jul 04 2020 04:59 pm
The plan for the digital dollar.
WHAT NO CASH ACTUALLY MEANS
OGG wrote to DUMAS WALKER <=-
I see more and more people using their watches and tablets for
proximity (contactless) transactions.
ARELOR wrote to OGG <=-
I agree that cash is conveniently easy to steal, but then lots of wares
in stores also are. Besides, going cashless does not make money harder
to steal. It only makes it easier to steal by governments and banks.
On 07-13-20 08:58, Nightfox wrote to Vk3jed <=-
In the past couple years, I've heard of a couple stories here about apartment landlors who suddenly asked tenants to vacate within 30 days
or something. I think there have been some laws enacted now to prevent landlords from suddenly forcing tenants out in such a short amount of time.
They crunched the numbers, and found that because it was better and better for
investors, that this means its more affordable. They completely ignored the problem of buying a house in the first place, and like most in the Real Estate
industry here, they forget that houses exist for people to live in, not to use
as speculative tools.
Whether to buy or rent seems to be a very cultural thing. Cultures where people switches jobs quite fast because they are
always looking for somethign better seem to tend to rent; sedentary styled ones seem to prefer purchase.
Finally bought a house about 2 years ago... After my last divorce I didn't think I'd go into a house again tbh, but rent seemed to go up about 60% in 4 years in my second to last apartment. I moved into the cheapest centrally located apartment I could find and for about 2 years, saved for a down payment. When I was closer to pulling the trigger, I stopped my tax deductions from payroll from 3 cycles and put that extra money with my savings as a down payment on a house.
There's also a huge variance between men and women on this... Single men are far more likely to rent. In general, financial advice is to buy
only if you intent to stay in place for 5-10 years as that's the typical break even to get ahead point.
Tracker1 wrote to Dennisk <=-for
On 7/11/2020 6:56 PM, Dennisk wrote:
They crunched the numbers, and found that because it was better and better
investors, that this means its more affordable. They completely ignored the problem of buying a house in the first place, and like most in the RealEstate
industry here, they forget that houses exist for people to live in, not touse
as speculative tools.
Finally bought a house about 2 years ago... After my last divorce I
didn't think I'd go into a house again tbh, but rent seemed to go up
about 60% in 4 years in my second to last apartment. I moved into the cheapest centrally located apartment I could find and for about 2
years, saved for a down payment. When I was closer to pulling the trigger, I stopped my tax deductions from payroll from 3 cycles and put that extra money with my savings as a down payment on a house.
It wasn't easy, it was uncomfortable and I wasn't always able to do
what I wanted during those 2 years. That's how you manage to get into
a house. That said, the house I bought is now showing only 2.4 years later that it's worth 19% more than what I bought it for. That's
another crash waiting to happen imho. It's unreasonable and
unsustainable to have that level of housing inflation. Not to mention that something like 50% of mortages were late or unpaid the month
before last.
I'm not sure how things will shake out, but I'm not moving for at least another ~3-5 years. I can only hope for my own sake that any bubble doesn't burst before I can sell, and that wherever I wind up moving they're in a dip/burst. I largely agree that investment properties
are, potentially an issue. That said, there's a lot of options and opportunities for people to buy.
growing up. In some ways, I kinda wish I still lived in an apartment so I wouldn't have to worry about any of that. Or at least a nice house without many issues (I bought a somewhat older one), perhaps without a yard or trees.. I've seen people put a slab of pavement in place of grass, which doesn't seem like a bad idea.
Re: Re: Cashless society is b
By: Nightfox to Tracker1 on Wed Aug 05 2020 04:40 pm
growing up. In some ways, I kinda wish I still lived in an apartment so I wouldn't have to worry about any of that. Or at least a nice house without many issues
bought a somewhat older one), perhaps without a yard or trees.. I've seen people put a slab of pavement in place of grass, which doesn't seem like a bad idea.
pavement is expensive though.
you can try having a wildflower garden. that's what people around me do.
i hate cutting grass too. i used to be a pro grass cutter. i cut ballparks and everything. i have an electric mower and it's a pain because of the cord.
then i have a gas mower but i think it needs to be sharpened. then if i use the gas mower i stink like gas.
i hate cutting grass too. i used to be a pro grass cutter. i cut ballparks and everything. i have an electric mower and it's a pain because of the cord. then i have a gas mower but i think it needs to be sharpened. then if i use the gas mower i stink like gas. ---
I moved to a mower model called Equus Ferus Caballus. They are big and unwieldly, but they are fully automatic - you leave them lose in an area and they trim the grass very quickly. If you have a male model and a female model, they will replicate and create a new mower every year. Their residues can be recycled and used for growing a healthy harvest. As a bonus, they provide lots of love and entertainment.
Re: Re: Cashless society is b
By: MRO to Nightfox on Wed Aug 05 2020 11:12 pm
i hate cutting grass too. i used to be a pro grass cutter. i cut
ballparks and everything. i have an electric mower and it's a pain
because of the cord. then i have a gas mower but i think it needs to
be sharpened. then if i use the gas mower i stink like gas. ---
Not just mowing a lawn, but also pulling weeds, trimming tree branches, etc..
Re: Re: Cashless society is b
By: Arelor to MRO on Thu Aug 06 2020 08:37 am
I moved to a mower model called Equus Ferus Caballus. They are big and unwieldly, but they are fully automatic - you leave them lose in an are and they trim the grass very quickly. If you have a male model and a female model, they will replicate and create a new mower every year. Th residues can be recycled and used for growing a healthy harvest. As a bonus, they provide lots of love and entertainment.
yeah but then you got the horse shit to deal with.
Finally bought a house about 2 years ago... After my last divorce I
didn't think I'd go into a house again tbh, but rent seemed to go up
about 60% in 4 years in my second to last apartment. I moved into the
cheapest centrally located apartment I could find and for about 2 years,
saved for a down payment. When I was closer to pulling the trigger, I
stopped my tax deductions from payroll from 3 cycles and put that extra
money with my savings as a down payment on a house.
I bought my first house in 2015 after living in apartments for a long time. I don't really like doing yard work, and I'm not really experienced doing house repairs & such, since I didn't do much of that kind of thing growing up. In some ways, I kinda wish I still lived in an apartment so I wouldn't have to worry about any of that. Or at least a nice house without many issues (I bought a somewhat older one), perhaps without a yard or trees.. I've seen people put a slab of pavement in place of grass, which doesn't seem like a bad idea.
There's also a huge variance between men and women on this... Single men
are far more likely to rent. In general, financial advice is to buy
only if you intent to stay in place for 5-10 years as that's the typical
break even to get ahead point.
I'm glad I've stayed in my house for 5 years now then.. My wife and I have been thinking of finding a new house that would suit us better.
Median house price in Sydney is about a million AUD. Melbourne is a little cheaper, but not much.
Good luck!
People are holding off having children because they cannot afford the home, which means our wise managerial class want to prop the population by bringing in people, or allowing external investors to buy up our real estate.
How people aren't rioting over this, I don't know.
Tracker1 wrote to Dennisk <=-bringing
On 8/6/2020 7:31 AM, Dennisk wrote:
Median house price in Sydney is about a million AUD. Melbourne is a little cheaper, but not much.
Good luck!
People are holding off having children because they cannot afford the home, which means our wise managerial class want to prop the population by
in people, or allowing external investors to buy up our real estate.
How people aren't rioting over this, I don't know.
It will get interresting at the outset of the COVID lockdowns in terms
of labor and how the economy recovers. I hope you guys don't relax foreign real estate investments, it's been a pretty bad result here in
the US with crazy rent hikes over the past decade. A lot of that may
well change with all the defaults on rent etc the past several months,
and roughtly half the population not paying rent or mortgages last
month. Will probably shift over into reforms on the credit agencies, which is way overdue esp regarding medical billing.
Just curious, what are you using to write your messages with? I've been using Thunderbird via nntp, but may look to other clients. Really want
to make one of my own (nntp based bbs message and telnet client, with offline ability).
Just curious, what are you using to write your messages with? I've been
using Thunderbird via nntp, but may look to other clients. Really want
to make one of my own (nntp based bbs message and telnet client, with
offline ability).
I've been using SlyEdit while logged into my BBS.
I wrote SlyEdit, as an editor I wanted to use on my BBS..
Cool, I have that setup for telnet.. I think the long line unwrapping is happening in my client... Some of the messages I was seeing from you
were single quote on a long line. May just be a thunderbird thing.
A while ago, I had updated SlyEdit to not do its own line wrapping. New message text typed by the user is saved as one long line. I thought message readers would be able to do their own line wrapping based on how wide it screen is.. I thought Thunderbird was intelligent enough to do its own line wrapping, but maybe not?
A while ago, I had updated SlyEdit to not do its own line wrapping.
New message text typed by the user is saved as one long line. I
thought message readers would be able to do their own line wrapping
based on how wide it screen is.. I thought Thunderbird was
intelligent enough to do its own line wrapping, but maybe not?
I think this is the best approach since we can't assume everyone is using an 80x25 screen like we always used to do (although I am using that now). It would be simpler to simply wrap those long lines for the display we are currently using.
Mystic was just updated to not truncate long lines at 256 characters and if your paragraph above was written as a long line then that update did what it was supposed to do.. :)
Cool, I have that setup for telnet.. I think the long line unwrapping is
happening in my client... Some of the messages I was seeing from you
were single quote on a long line. May just be a thunderbird thing.
A while ago, I had updated SlyEdit to not do its own line wrapping. New message text typed by the user is saved as one long line. I thought message readers would be able to do their own line wrapping based on how wide it screen is.. I thought Thunderbird was intelligent enough to do its own line wrapping, but maybe not?
On 8/13/2020 8:48 AM, Nightfox wrote:
Cool, I have that setup for telnet.. I think the long line unwrapping is >>> happening in my client... Some of the messages I was seeing from you
were single quote on a long line. May just be a thunderbird thing.
A while ago, I had updated SlyEdit to not do its own line wrapping.
New message text typed by the user is saved as one long line. I
thought message readers would be able to do their own line wrapping
based on how wide it screen is.. I thought Thunderbird was
intelligent enough to do its own line wrapping, but maybe not?
Kind of... for the new part of the message I am typing in, it will wrap based on the input settings. However, the quoted parts, it leaves as a long line after the > character. Not that it matters much to me, but
may look weird to downstream readers. For example, I didn't modify the quoted part of my own reply, leaving line endings as-is.
It's definitely a T-Bird thing... and I'm connecting via my local sbbs
setup which is doing qwk polling through vert... I still need to work on
the hub a bit at some point. I'm considering just creating a bespoke
NNTP server for holding BBS messages and creating a program to poll vert
to start with. Still want to get it setup so that other nets/sysops can setup additional areas and push/pull and allow for inter-bbs messaging promoting nntp as the transport.
Sysop: | Eric Oulashin |
---|---|
Location: | Beaverton, Oregon, USA |
Users: | 89 |
Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
Uptime: | 02:38:09 |
Calls: | 5,076 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 8,491 |
Messages: | 351,651 |