I also had a question. I trie dgetting SyncTERM to work and eventually did in Arch Linux. However when I connect to a board it displays a window bordered by "SyncTERM". This might look cool, but I use a screen reader,
and it makes it unusable. Does a way exist to disable this effect? I sent a message to the author, hopefully he'll respond soon. I get the feeling the standard telnet program lacks.
Ascii Express wrote to All <=-
I also had a question. I trie dgetting SyncTERM to work and eventually
did in Arch Linux. However when I connect to a board it displays a
window bordered by "SyncTERM". This might look cool, but I use a screen reader, and it makes it unusable. Does a way exist to disable this
effect? I sent a message to the author, hopefully he'll respond soon. I get the feeling the standard telnet program lacks.
"SyncTERM". This might look cool, but I use a screen reader, and it makes it unusable. Does a way exist to disable this effect? I sent a message to the author, hopefully he'll respond soon. I get the feeling the standard telnet program lacks.
I also had a question. I trie dgetting SyncTERM to work and eventually did in Arch Linux. However when I connect to a board it displays a window bordered by "SyncTERM". This might look cool, but I use a screen reader,
and it makes it unusable. Does a way exist to disable this effect? I sent a message to the author, hopefully he'll respond soon. I get the feeling the standard telnet program lacks.
I think your looking for something that doesn't exist. If you use a screen reader then telnet itself will work and is pretty much the best you can hope for. ANSI Graphics and screen readers really don't mix.
Has anyone out there heard of something that does both?
I think your looking for something that doesn't exist. If you use a screen reader then telnet itself will work and is pretty much the best you can
hope for. ANSI Graphics and screen readers really don't mix.
Has anyone out there heard of something that does both?
Yeah I tried SyncTERM with that problem. I tried Qodem.. I have to play
more but it crashed already, but I still have to experiment more. It seems
more but it crashed already, but I still have to experiment more. It seems to have an issue in the menus, I use highlight tracking with Speakup and it
move the cursor to the line of the current choice. I remember the author asked for some feedback so there you go. So far standard vanilla telnet
still works the best, but it does have awful issues cluttering up the screen. I thought a better emulation would help solve that problem.
ASCII Express wrote to bcw142 <=-
I tried Qodem.. I have to play
more but it crashed already, but I still have to experiment more. It
seems to have an issue in the menus, I use highlight tracking with
Speakup and it doesn't seem to track the current choice. Either that or the menu should move the cursor to the line of the current choice. I remember the author asked for some feedback so there you go.
So far
standard vanilla telnet still works the best, but it does have awful issues cluttering up the screen. I thought a better emulation would
help solve that problem.
Sysop: | Eric Oulashin |
---|---|
Location: | Beaverton, Oregon, USA |
Users: | 89 |
Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
Uptime: | 02:09:57 |
Calls: | 5,076 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 8,491 |
Messages: | 351,648 |