And no, while I may have VC6 I haven't even dreampt of trying to compile synchronet for it...... even if it did work, I think I'm the last NT/Alpha user
out there.
Probably... Anyone else still running that hardware is probably using Linux or BSD.Speaking of which, anyone feel like porting Synchronet to the Cray-2?
Re: Re: Windows NT / Dec Alpha C compiler question....
By: Tracker1 to Winthorpe on Fri Jan 22 2010 05:37 pm
Probably... Anyone else still running that hardware is probably using Linux or BSD.Speaking of which, anyone feel like porting Synchronet to the Cray-2?
(yeah right, like anyone with the money for a Cray-2 would be running a
BBS on it.... But then again... if I had the money for a Cray-2, just
imagine what I could do.... get a bank of like 30 modems, and a T-2
straight to the cray-2, re-compile Synchronet to allow for like 100
telnet's in and about 30 ftp's in... Hey, what the heck, if you've got
the money for a system like that, you'd have the money for the phone
lines and the internet bandwidth!)
I was implying having Synchronet run ON the Cray computer ;-)Speaking of which, anyone feel like porting Synchronet to the Cray-2?Synchronet already supports 100+ terminal server nodes and 30+ FTP clients. No recompiling would be necessary (to support those numbers, at least).
(yeah right, like anyone with the money for a Cray-2 would be running
Re: Re: Windows NT / Dec Alpha C compiler question....
By: Digital Man to John Guillory on Tue Mar 02 2010 02:16 pm
I was implying having Synchronet run ON the Cray computer ;-)Speaking of which, anyone feel like porting Synchronet to the Cray-Synchronet already supports 100+ terminal server nodes and 30+ FTP client No recompiling would be necessary (to support those numbers, at least).
(yeah right, like anyone with the money for a Cray-2 would be runni
Not that I personally own one, but would love to own one and if I did,
you better believe I'd love to have synchronet running on it....
Re: Re: Windows NT / Dec Alpha C compiler question....
By: Digital Man to John Guillory on Tue Mar 02 2010 02:16 pm
I was implying having Synchronet run ON the Cray computer ;-)Speaking of which, anyone feel like porting Synchronet to the Cray-2?Synchronet already supports 100+ terminal server nodes and 30+ FTP clients. No recompiling would be necessary (to support those numbers, at least).
(yeah right, like anyone with the money for a Cray-2 would be running
I was implying having Synchronet run ON the Cray computer ;-)
Not that I personally own one, but would love to own one and if I did,
you better believe I'd love to have synchronet running on it....
I was implying having Synchronet run ON the Cray computer ;-)
Not that I personally own one, but would love to own one and if I did,
you better believe I'd love to have synchronet running on it....
Blowing bubbles costs more than buying it.
Seriously, Synchronet wouldn't benefit from a vector computer.
Blowing bubbles costs more than buying it.Dude, I could care less about the cost issue (assuming i had the $$$
Seriously, Synchronet wouldn't benefit from a vector computer.
score some nerd points. Heck, I think it'd be awsesome, just so long asShhh, didn't you see Married with Children? There's a big heavy wire running to the utility pole.... But when it blows, the whole streets out!
his neighbor doesn't notice the extension cord... :)
Blowing bubbles costs more than buying it.
Seriously, Synchronet wouldn't benefit from a vector computer.
Dude, I could care less about the cost issue (assuming i had the $$$
to buy a cray-2.... ) It would be increadibly awesome to have the
login screen say it was running on a Cray2 and maybe have an option to
create user accounts on the cray and allow users to shell from the BBS
to the cray... And SBBS could handle all the e-mail on the cray.... ;-)
| Sysop: | Eric Oulashin |
|---|---|
| Location: | Beaverton, Oregon, USA |
| Users: | 99 |
| Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
| Uptime: | 04:09:56 |
| Calls: | 3,539 |
| Calls today: | 6 |
| Files: | 8,461 |
| Messages: | 337,385 |