I heard D'Bridge can be used with Net2BBS. Is this true ? can Net2BBS pass connection to D'Bridge, and then D'Bridge passes a caller to the BBS ?
I am not sure how Net2BBS works. I tend to think of it as something that allows programs to piggyback off a live connection (ie. Data Carrier Detect has to be high) (which is why it will not work with a program in Wait For Caller mode).
D'Bridge must first be told that when it runs to assume that a caller
is "on the line" and to exit when the call completes. So you create a dummy semaphore file called LINE1.OTL in the DB directory.
Start Net2BBS, test by telnetting locally. Net2BBS should spawn
DBRUN.CMD which loads D'Bridge. In your telnet session you see the D'Bridge logo followed by "Press ESC twice to access the BBS". Doing so will swap the mailer out to execute whatever commands you specified.
When the BBS terminates, the session returns to the mailer which at
this point has sensed "dropped carrier" and thus terminates back to DBRUN... which exits.
Why cannot Net2BBS just pass the raw connection to D'Bridge WFC mode ? is it because the author wants to sell NetSerial instead ?
You are running D'Bridge like a door.
That is cheating :)
Why cannot Net2BBS just pass the raw connection to D'Bridge WFC mode ? is i because the author wants to sell NetSerial instead ?
The author of Net2BBS/Net2Serial is actually a pretty cool guy.
Nick
Why cannot Net2BBS just pass the raw connection to D'Bridge WFC mode ? is it because the author wants to sell NetSerial instead ?
Hmmmmmm ... you do know who D'Bridge's maintainer/author is and how
much he charges for that ... right ?
Besides, I think there's something wrong with your clock setting ...
You are running D'Bridge like a door.
That is cheating :)
"I'm allowed to look at the menu... but I cannot order anything".
Why cannot Net2BBS just pass the raw connection to D'Bridge WFC mode ? is i
because the author wants to sell NetSerial instead ?
Possibly. No matter how much messing around I just could never get it working in the WFC method.
The author of Net2BBS/Net2Serial is actually a pretty cool guy.
I know he charged an arm and a leg:
==================================================
D'Bridge EMAIL System - Single-line 1.58 Ordering Information / 5 April 199
Why cannot Net2BBS just pass the raw connection to D'Bridge WFC mode it because the author wants to sell NetSerial instead ?
Hmmmmmm ... you do know who D'Bridge's maintainer/author is and how MJ>WD> much he charges for that ... right ?
I know he charged an arm and a leg:
I know he charged an arm and a leg:
==================================================
D'Bridge EMAIL System - Single-line 1.58 Ordering Information / 5 April 19
will have to use NetSerial, if you want to pass telnet infor to
something, and login, use net2bbs. A suggestion, if you want to have a 5 node system, make nodes 1-4 net2bbs on one port, and node 5, use
I know he charged an arm and a leg:
==================================================
D'Bridge EMAIL System - Single-line 1.58 Ordering Information / 5 April 19
will have to use NetSerial, if you want to pass telnet infor to
something, and login, use net2bbs. A suggestion, if you want to have a 5 node system, make nodes 1-4 net2bbs on one port, and node 5, use
I know he charged an arm and a leg:
WHERE are you getting all this OLD $H!T NEWS?!?!?!
Then came this spoiled bratt from somewhere Toronto who convinced Chris Irw to release the code, which Chris eventually reluctantly did as if he was giving away the PIN-code of Fort Knox.
I know he charged an arm and a leg:He is not the original maintainer. He has offered it for free for the last decade or so. I sadly wish the wwiv maintainer had a twit filter. :(
==================================================
D'Bridge EMAIL System - Single-line 1.58 Ordering Information / 5 April 1994
He is not the original maintainer. He has offered it for free for the last decade or so. I sadly wish the wwiv maintainer had a twit filter. :(
Then came this spoiled bratt from somewhere Toronto who convincedChris Irw
to release the code, which Chris eventually reluctantly did as if hewas
giving away the PIN-code of Fort Knox.
Excuse me.... I'm a charming brat....
Excuse me.... I'm a charming brat....
That was in 2007 ...
That's how I have it on my board. But not too many mailer to mailer calls anymore, so I just load it when someone needs it.
I know he charged an arm and a leg:
==================================================
D'Bridge EMAIL System - Single-line 1.58 Ordering Information / 5 April 19
WHERE are you getting all this OLD $H!T NEWS?!?!?!
DB is Free and Nick is the author. Please go post in the local bases where no one can read your posts.
Hmmmmmm ... you do know who D'Bridge's maintainer/author is and how
much he charges for that ... right ?
I know he charged an arm and a leg:
I've used D'Bridge first as a point, later as a node, since 1988 or
1989.
Never paid a cent for it.
I know he charged an arm and a leg:
==================================================
D'Bridge EMAIL System - Single-line 1.58 Ordering Information / 5 April 199
You're talking about the original author... I never took a dime.
last decade or so. I sadly wish the wwiv maintainer had a twit
filter. :(
Why cannot Net2BBS just pass the raw connection to D'Bridge WFC mode it because the author wants to sell NetSerial instead ?
Come on, thats not fair, two different softwares for two different purposes. I use both. If you want to use FD or D'Bridge WFC screen,
you will have to use NetSerial, if you want to pass telnet infor to something, and login, use net2bbs. A suggestion, if you want to have a
5 node system, make nodes 1-4 net2bbs on one port, and node 5, use netserial on the last node to answer the mailer on a different port.
Give both out to your users. If they want to call node 5, they just
hit esc twice and log in as usual. Now you have a dedicated mail node, and 4 user nodes. Process all your events on node 5. It's doable.
You're talking about the original author... I never took a dime.
Yes well, first impressions last.
The information is cited from the program documentation.
D'Bridge was not free and Nick Andre was not the original author.
That's how I have it on my board. But not too many mailer to mailer calls anymore, so I just load it when someone needs it.
I was thing of setting up GAP that way, and make node 10 the mailer, and 1-9 human. I know it works, as I've helped others do it, just haven't kicked it into gear over here yet.
Yes well, first impressions last.
I'm not quite sure I understand what that means?
I know he charged an arm and a leg:
I've used D'Bridge first as a point, later as a node, since 1988 or MJ>WD> 1989.
Never paid a cent for it.
According to its terms of use, should you have paid for it ?
If Net2BBS only spawns BBS processes on demand, then the "Who's Online" menu will not show all the nodes. I want people to see that I have 256 nodes waiting for a connection.
I tend to think of Net2BBS as NetSerial Lite.
Does NetSerial have anti-portscanning features ?
If Net2BBS only spawns BBS processes on demand, then the "Who's Online" me will not show all the nodes. I want people to see that I have 256 nodes wa for a connection.
I have Renegade set up this way. Nodes 1 to 8 are telnet, 9 is the dialup modem line and my own local-logins.
Nick
If you have 256 nodes set up in your BBS config, they should show up as just "offline" or "Waiting For Call". Honestly in todays bbs world, why would you want 256 nodes. If a caller hit "Whos Online", and has to
This. Showing 256 nodes all idle (well, 255 if you count one person logged to see the list), just seems a bit strange.
This. Showing 256 nodes all idle (well, 255 if you count one personlogged
to see the list), just seems a bit strange.
I agree fully. I think I'm going to take the same approach as the others have, and just stay quiet when it comes to this person. LOL, it's the
safest option.
--- GAPNetW - Ver 6.7
* Origin: Valhalla II - bbs.valhallabbs.com:24, Richmond, VA (1:275/95)
I'm running RemoteAccess (SW since it's impossible to register it seems) which is limited to 2 nodes.EleBBS might be an alternative for you. You could run that instead.
I've had both nodes active at the same time a few times, but it's rare. Even with the addition of a Tetris door... :D
I'm running RemoteAccess (SW since it's impossible to register it seems) w is limited to 2 nodes.
I've had both nodes active at the same time a few times, but it's rare. E with the addition of a Tetris door... :D
3 or 4 nodes would be plenty to avoid anyone ver seeing a 'busy' signal.
Back in the early to mid 90s I was a single node (poor high school student paying $10/mo for a second phone line in my mom's house) and could have md of more nodes. But today, traffic isn't so high (yet... here's hoping!)
:)
Andre:
You're talking about the original author... I never took a dime.
Yes well, first impressions last.
I'm not quite sure I understand what that means?
On 27 Mar 21 10:14:00, Marceline Jones said the following to T.J. Mcmillen:
The information is cited from the program documentation.
Can I politely ask what version documentation you are citing this
from?
When I obtained the code in 2005-ish, the first thing I did was make
it freeware. Word of mouth quickly spread and this echo exploded in traffic, everyone being excited to see it being worked on again. There have been many releases since then. The most recent was... yesterday.
I've had Sysops offer to pay me for adding BinkD and TIC processing, offers to pay me for support which I've very politely declined. I've answered international phone calls for troubleshooting, replied to countless emails and Netmails... and never took a dime.
Ward will tell you enthusiastically... "Best pizza I ever bought".
D'Bridge was not free and Nick Andre was not the original author.
Everyone knows this... I'm sensing some hostility or a need to split hairs.
A famous Canuck band sang We're here for a good time, not a long time.
I tend to think of Net2BBS as NetSerial Lite.
It's not, they are two compleatly different programs.
If you have 256 nodes set up in your BBS config, they should show up
as just "offline" or "Waiting For Call". Honestly in todays bbs world,
why would you want 256 nodes. If a caller hit "Whos Online", and has
to scroll through 12 pages of "waiting for calls", he/she is lible to disconnect and move on. I would love to have all my nodes busy with
callers, but the fact is, that's not gonna happen these days. I have
15 nodes available, 5 for each one of my systems, and It's a good day
if 2 nodes are busy at the same time by legit callers. Let's face it, most of todays callers are other sysops in the hobby. I've been in this hobby since the early 90's, and I've seen the day when I had ten
callers on at one time. I used to run a paid system, with 10 incomming phone lines, and if felt good making that money, but I always put it
According to its terms of use, should you have paid for it ?
Well, I never did even though D'Bridge in those days could not
function without one.
It sounds like you have a marketing and value proposition problem. Maybe if you held cash prize competitions you could get 100 simultaneous online callers. You could fund it with OnlyFans.
Well, I never did even though D'Bridge in those days could not
function without one.
Does that mean you got a free key or stop using the program ?
It sounds like you have a marketing and value proposition problem. MaybePeople find the interface of the bbs antiquated and a big turnoff even if you tried payola.
if you held cash prize competitions you could get 100 simultaneous
online callers. You could fund it with OnlyFans.
Because it is endearing and cute.
It sounds like you have a marketing and value proposition problem. Maybe if you held cash prize competitions you could get 100 simultaneous online callers. You could fund it with OnlyFans.
Were those offers made before or after you added those features ?
Did you decline because you did not want the obligation and/or accountabili of supporting D'Bridge ?
There is also the saying "Forgive but don't forget". People act as though D'Bridge is the best thing ever, and readily praise and come to its defense But I remember a time when people were incentivised to snitch on SysOps tha violated evaluation agreements. My view is snitches get stitches.
Sysop: | Eric Oulashin |
---|---|
Location: | Beaverton, Oregon, USA |
Users: | 94 |
Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
Uptime: | 01:43:06 |
Calls: | 5,219 |
Calls today: | 6 |
Files: | 8,493 |
D/L today: |
322 files (216M bytes) |
Messages: | 354,342 |
Posted today: | 1 |