MAIL TOSSERS
BBS SOFTWARE
TIC PROCESSORS/FILEFIX/SRIF
BBS DOORS/UTILITIES
SYSOP MAIL EDITORS
INTERNET UTILITIES
INFORMATIONAL WEBSITES/BBS LISTS
The Fidoweb is here!
Last week's statistics from the Fidoweb
By EchoTime, 2:203/0
(Some nets may have lost their last
digit for technical reasons)
pkt (toss-toss) msg (write-toss)
nodes mean dev no mean dev no
Hi!
The Fidoweb is here!
This is news for me. :-o
I've just found some statistics about FidoWeb (from 2016 to 2019) but nothing else than this, after 2019...
Last week's statistics from the Fidoweb
By EchoTime, 2:203/0
(Some nets may have lost their last
digit for technical reasons)
pkt (toss-toss) msg (write-toss)
nodes mean dev no mean dev no
I can't see what is Fidoweb.
It results in many dupes and little loss.
It results in many dupes and little loss.
And if the system is set-up correctly with decent software, then it doesn't matter. The dupes are filtered-out and all is well.
The Fidoweb is here!
This is news for me. :-o
Where can I find info about FidoWeb?
Where can I find info about FidoWeb?
It results in many dupes and little loss.
And if the system is set-up correctly with decent software, then it
doesn't matter. The dupes are filtered-out and all is well.
Indeed, the dupes are unavoidable if you want to get to little loss or better, zero loss.
"The soul of a small kitten in the body of a mighty dragon. Look on my majesty, ye mighty, and despair! Or bring me catnip. Your choice. Oooh, a shiny thing!"
Indeed, the dupes are unavoidable if you want to get to little loss or
better, zero loss.
don't forget bypassing feed cuts which also negates moderators...
I can't see what is Fidoweb.The fidoweb is from Z2. Many nodes connect together to mesh the message areas.
It results in many dupes and little loss.
Where can I find info about FidoWeb?A more technical article can be found here:
Didn't I just give you that in the article? ;)
If you don't know the meaning of "mean" and "deviation", just ask. Either me or Google.
The weekly FidoWeb statistics is always in the Snooze, not only "from 2016
to 2019".
That's true. If a feed cut was ever wanted by a moderator you would need the support of those nodes in Z2 to implement it.
Fidonet is truly a free speech network. I'm not making a judgement if
that is good or bad just saying that is the case.
don't forget bypassing feed cuts which also negates moderators...
That's true. If a feed cut was ever wanted by a moderator you would
need the support of those nodes in Z2 to implement it.
I can't see what is Fidoweb.The fidoweb is from Z2. Many nodes connect together to mesh the message
areas. It results in many dupes and little loss.
I think I got it. Thank you!
What I don't understand is its application:
aren't there any regulations regarding this?
Is it permitted to link to any node,
without location restrictions?
Can all echomail be exchanged with all nodes?
Does netmail only respect the link/routing structure when it's not a direct netmail?
I assume all the answers are: Yes.
Is there a minimum and maximum number of links allowed in the NADS/FidoWeb setting up?
Is there a minimum and maximum number of links allowed in the
NADS/FidoWeb setting up?
With 1 link you are not following the fidoweb concept. With 2 it depends on
who you have linked to. But the minimum number of links is 2.
Is there a minimum and maximum number of links allowed in the
NADS/FidoWeb setting up?
With 1 link you are not following the fidoweb concept. With 2 it depends
on who you have linked to. But the minimum number of links is 2.
you keep leaving out the key fundamental aspect of the "web"... that aspect
being "more than one link per echo"... going by what you wrote, having one link for echoA and one link for echoB follows the concept...
but that's how all echos were once distributed back when making long distance and/or international phone calls cost $$$...
having more than one link for an echo is key... especially when those
two links are connected to each other in a triangle fashion... more
than 2 links in one echo becomes a "fully connected polygon" with some legs being longer than others...
that's what the various "backbone star hubs" in the various backbones
did from the beginning... it is no different other than there now
being many ad hoc polygons for some echos...
all in all, the web opened people's eyes in the same manner that satellite distribution opened people's eyes...
both showed that each system can connect to any other system they have
an agreement with and exchange mail... many thought the "branches of a tree" distribution flow was "forced" when it never was...
people chose to use those distribution branches to keep their phone
bills at a manageable level... this also meant they agreed to whatever restrictions may have been in place in that distribution system...
some did not agree and found their own links for the echos they were interested in... sure, they had a larger phone bill but they got what they wanted when and how they wanted it... eg: some systems made only one or two
calls to their feed per day... others called on-demand at any time... this made some feeds faster than others but this carried that additional $$$ cost,
too...
The maximum is the number of nodes in the nodelist. ;-)
That the Fidoweb is a Z2 thing is a misunderstanding. Nodes from al zones are particpating.
What is now called the Fidoweb actually started with a link between me
and Roy Witt to bypass the blockade set up by the instigators of the Fidonews coup.
The maximum is the number of nodes in the nodelist. ;-)
Minus one.
It's not a Z2 specific thing!
And btw the fidoweb is a concept, not an entity you must join, or proclaim to be part of.
Basically anyone with more then 1 link (that isn't a "leaf node") is part of the fidoweb, if they like it or not. ;-)
So Alan is also part of the fidoweb. ;-)
What I don't understand is its application:Make echomail (feeds) fail tolerant, and thus more reliable.
Btw: The fidoweb has nothing to do with netmail.
The maximum is the number of nodes in the nodelist. ;-)
What I don't understand is its application:Make echomail (feeds) fail tolerant, and thus more reliable.
I referred to how to implement it: I contact via netmail a SysOp of my choose?
Does it have to be something public "ey! I need some links!" ?
I contact via netmail a SysOp of my choose?Yes.
Does it have to be something public "ey! I need some links!" ?Could also work. ;-)
Great. I'll do it once I get the whole backbone linked with my current link.
I'll do it once I get the whole backbone linked with my current link.What's a backbone?
I'll do it once I get the whole backbone linked with my current link.What's a backbone?
Since I've been exchanging only local echoes from the 2:34 the last 20 years,
"backbone" is for me the international corpus of echo areas that all of you ar
exchanging. :-)
I'm wondering if the echolist -as some kind of echo reference- would be serving this "backbone" concept for me, now I'm looking beyond the 2:34 scope.
But with your question, I think that I have to assume there's no
backbone, isn't it, Ward?
There is a backbone although some like to call it something else.
I'm wondering if the echolist -as some kind of echo reference- would beThat is what the echolist is. It doesn't list every echo but it lists known echoes at least and if moderators wish it they can list their echoes there.
Yes, there are no backbones anymore and at the same time we are all together one single big backbone. No-one has power ...
If we wanted to explain this to the world, could we describe this
situation as a case of Fidonet self-regulation and the evolution of the distribution model (from star to matrix) when human behaviour forces the network or attempts to corrupt it? Would you agree with this conclusion, Ward?
There is a backbone although some like to call it something else.
Yep. Until two days ago, I thought that the FidoNet structure was the hierarchical one I've read from the docs. Now I see that the thing is a little bit complex due to human condition.
I'm wondering if the echolist -as some kind of echo reference- would beThat is what the echolist is. It doesn't list every echo but it lists known >> echoes at least and if moderators wish it they can list their echoes there.
I can only see it in a positive light: when I look around to get information about an echo before to link it, it seems it's the only way to get it as it's difficult to find an updated .na file.
Hi Alan,
There is a backbone although some like to call it something else.
Yep. Until two days ago, I thought that the FidoNet structure was the hierarchical one I've read from the docs.
Now I see that the thing is a little bit complex due to human
condition.
I'm wondering if the echolist -as some kind of echo reference- wouldThat is what the echolist is. It doesn't list every echo but it lists
be
known echoes at least and if moderators wish it they can list their
echoes there.
I can only see it in a positive light: when I look around to get information about an echo before to link it, it seems it's the only way to get it as it's difficult to find an updated .na file.
Yep. Until two days ago, I thought that the FidoNet structure was the
hierarchical one I've read from the docs.
that's the administrative one... mail distribution is different (in Fidonet)... othernets may employ their own distribution system(s)... some do
use the admin tree structure for distributed mail and even for the routing of
netmail...
network or attempts to corrupt it? Would you agree with this conclusion,I think that is well worded.
The word 'anarchy' came to mind but there is poetry in your description.
difficult to find an updated .na file.There is a BACKBONE.NA included in the monthly echolist archive hatched in the
ECHOLIST file area.
Yep. Until two days ago, I thought that the FidoNet structure was thethat's the administrative one... mail distribution is different (in Fidonet).. >othernets may employ their own distribution system(s)... some do use the admin
hierarchical one I've read from the docs.
tree structure for distributed mail and even for the routing of netmail...
it isn't that difficult to find the echolist and NA/NO file(s)... the latest updated one(s) is/are distributed in its FDN each month IIRC...
The difficulty varies from who knows or not. :-D
I've been on both sides. ;-)
I've been on both sides. ;-)Hmmm ... Joni Mitchel ... 8-)
I've looked at life from both sides now
From win and lose and still somehow
It's life's illusions I recall
I really don't know life at all
Nice lyrics, Ward.
Spaniah is a language which has been created for poets ...
┐QuΘ sienten los poetas andaluces de ahora?
I know you're Catalan ... there are Catalan poets as well ...
| Sysop: | Eric Oulashin |
|---|---|
| Location: | Beaverton, Oregon, USA |
| Users: | 99 |
| Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
| Uptime: | 11:34:01 |
| Calls: | 8,828 |
| Files: | 9,537 |
| D/L today: |
77 files (114M bytes) |
| Messages: | 421,270 |