)\/(ark
-!- SBBSecho 3.11-Linux
! Origin: SouthEast Star Mail HUB - SESTAR (1:3634/12)
Did you get tired of using RemoteAccess or something ?
Did you get tired of using RemoteAccess or something ?
being without power for several weeks due to Hurricane Florence killed that system... when we attempted to bring it back online, it didn't
know how to init the HDs... since that was the last non-linux system
in the herd, we decided to go ahead and move everything to linux... we
tested a couple of different linux native BBSes over several days and selected the one that worked best for us and our HUB setup and allowed
us to get back in operation as fast as possible while providing all the services and capabilities we had glued together with shoestring and bubblegum previously...
being without power for several weeks due to Hurricane Florence killed that system... when we attempted to bring it back online, it didn't
know how to init the HDs... since that was the last non-linux system
in the herd, we decided to go ahead and move everything to linux... we
Didn't you backup your BBS ?
Why not restore it to a virtual machine ?
tested a couple of different linux native BBSes over several days and selected the one that worked best for us and our HUB setup and allowed
us to get back in operation as fast as possible while providing all the services and capabilities we had glued together with shoestring and bubblegum previously...
But it is the shoestring and gum that makes the BBS unique. Now you are like everybody else who pretends to run a unique system on Synchronet because they changed a few ANSI screens around.
Marceline Jones wrote to MARK LEWIS <=-
tested a couple of different linux native BBSes over several days and selected the one that worked best for us and our HUB setup and allowed
us to get back in operation as fast as possible while providing all the services and capabilities we had glued together with shoestring and bubblegum previously...
But it is the shoestring and gum that makes the BBS unique. Now
you are like everybody else who pretends to run a unique system
on Synchronet because they changed a few ANSI screens around.
But it is the shoestring and gum that makes the BBS unique. Now
you are like everybody else who pretends to run a unique system
on Synchronet because they changed a few ANSI screens around.
Uh-huh. So what kind of "unique" system are YOU running? What customizations have YOU made? Do you have a BBS? What's the address?
of course i did... that's how i was able to get my new system online
so fast...
Why not restore it to a virtual machine ?
easier said than done... OS/2 is not so easily installed in a VM...
that's my perogative, really... i just want the thing to run and
provide the services i've been providing all these years... now it is
a lot easier and i don't have things falling over because they're not
made to go together in the first place... plus it is more than just a
few ansi screens that i switched... my logon process is much
different... i haven't completed my shell changes, either, but when i
do, it will be different... for now, i'm content that it is running without problems and i'm able to function properly as one of the top
tier star meshed hubs... more than that is gravy...
Marceline Jones wrote to DAN CLOUGH <=-
You want to see a unique system ? then use software that nobody
else is using.
You want to see a unique system ? then use software that nobody else is usi
You want to see a unique system ? then use software that nobody elseis usi
For a long time I was the only Renegade BBS in Fido.
For a long time I was the only Renegade BBS in Fido.
For a long time ... a veeeery long time, I was the only D'bridge addict in Fidonet.
easier said than done... OS/2 is not so easily installed in a VM...
Don't people use ArcaOS nowadays ?
I am surprised you have not resurrected Waldo's Place. Don't you
feel like all that work is for nothing otherwise ?
@BBSID: VERT
of course i did... that's how i was able to get my new system
online so fast...
Why not restore it to a virtual machine ?
easier said than done... OS/2 is not so easily installed in a
VM...
Don't people use ArcaOS nowadays ?
Marceline Jones wrote to DAN CLOUGH <=-
But it is the shoestring and gum that makes the BBS unique. Now
you are like everybody else who pretends to run a unique system
on Synchronet because they changed a few ANSI screens around.
Uh-huh. So what kind of "unique" system are YOU running? What customizations have YOU made? Do you have a BBS? What's the address?
Did I touch a nerve ? Are you one of those people who pretend to
run a unique system on Synchronet by changing some ANSI screens ?
You want to see a unique system ? then use software that nobody
else is using.
Quoting Marceline Jones to Dan Clough <=-
You want to see a unique system ? then use software that nobody else
is using.
Quoting Ward Dossche to Nick Andre <=-
You want to see a unique system ? then use software that nobody elseis usi
For a long time I was the only Renegade BBS in Fido.
For a long time ... a veeeery long time, I was the only D'bridge
addict in Fidonet.
For a long time ... a veeeery long time, I was the only D'bridge
addict in Fidonet.
And I'm the only one using the INDIGO Point software in Fidonet. :-)
Mauro,
Ahhhh ... we can't all be perfect.For a long time ... a veeeery long time, I was theonly D'bridge WD> addict in Fidonet. And I'm the only one
using the INDIGO Point software in Fidonet. :-)
Did I touch a nerve ? Are you one of those people who pretend to
run a unique system on Synchronet by changing some ANSI screens ?
You didn't answer any of my questions. I guess you're not running a
BBS, eh?
You want to see a unique system ? then use software that nobody
else is using.
Right. Everyone should just write their very own BBS software. Is
that what you do? Oh! That's right! You don't run a BBS.
You want to see a unique system ? then use software that nobody
else is using.
Like Concord maybe?
You want to see a unique system ? then use software that nobody else is usi
For a long time I was the only Renegade BBS in Fido.
Don't people use ArcaOS nowadays ?
those that have the $$$ to spend on it, sure...
I am surprised you have not resurrected Waldo's Place. Don't you
feel like all that work is for nothing otherwise ?
no, i don't feel like that... my RA setup had a grand run...
development stopped, there's no more support, and it is time to move
on to newer software that is much more modern... RA was 16 bit and
closed source... my synchronet build is 64bit and open source... i can
fix bugs in it or even change and add things if i want without needing approval or support from anyone... the differences are black and
white...
You want to see a unique system ? then use software that nobody else
is using.
Try Valhalla - bbs.valhallabbs.com:24 - C.G. Learn run a nice
GAP-BBS system.
For a long time I was the only Renegade BBS in Fido.
Was this before or after the year 2000 ?
People spout open source like it is practical for anybody to change whatever they want.
But in reality, when was the last time you committed a Synchronet patch ?
Marceline Jones wrote to TOMMI KOIVULA <=-
You want to see a unique system ? then use software that nobody
else is using.
Like Concord maybe?
There are tonnes of unused BBS software on bbsdocumentary.
No matter how much people try to mod their Synchronet BBS, they
cannot get rid of the Synchronet smell.
___ Blue Wave/386 v2.30
--- SBBSecho 3.13-Linux
* Origin: Vertrauen - [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net (1:103/705)
Marceline Jones wrote to MAURO VEIGA <=-
You want to see a unique system ? then use software that nobody else
is using.
Try Valhalla - bbs.valhallabbs.com:24 - C.G. Learn run a nice
GAP-BBS system.
I get:
atdt bbs.valhallabbs.com:24
NO CARRIER
mark lewis wrote to Marceline Jones <=-
People spout open source like it is practical for anybody to change whatever they want.
and some spout things about archiving messages using techniques
and methods that were not considered, capable of being done, or
even a fleeting thought back in the day... especially in a
*hobby* network where 95% of the available software was written
by amateurs, high schoolers, and had no real documentation in
place...
But in reality, when was the last time you committed a Synchronet patch ?
why don't you take a look for yourself... the tools are
available...
FWIW: most of my work and contributions were in tickit.js and
tickitcfg.js but i also provided a series of patches to clean up
the dosemu setup routine and execution... other than that, i have
provided a bit of input here and there on other parts of
synchronet... input that was used to further the capabilities of
sbbs on the FTN side of the fence...
You want to see a unique system ? then use software that nobody else
is using.
Try Valhalla - bbs.valhallabbs.com:24 - C.G. Learn run a nice
GAP-BBS system.
I get:
atdt bbs.valhallabbs.com:24
NO CARRIER
@BBSID: PALANT
Marceline Jones wrote to MAURO VEIGA <=-
You want to see a unique system ? then use software that nobody
else is using.
Try Valhalla - bbs.valhallabbs.com:24 - C.G. Learn run a nice
GAP-BBS system.
I get:
atdt bbs.valhallabbs.com:24
NO CARRIER
Then your system is mis-configured. Works fine for me.
For a long time I was the only Renegade BBS in Fido.
Was this before or after the year 2000 ?
Oh after. When The Titantic BBS shutdown - that was apparently the
only other board in Fido running Renegade and actively doing
development - I was seemingly the only one left for at least a few
years. That board resurfaced recently though along with some others so unfortunately I lost those particular bragging-rights.
Pretty much everyone else I knew that was into Renegade faded away or
went off to Synchronet and Mystic. I've heard some Sysops call Mystic "Renegade on steroids" but to me its a completely different animal entirely.
I noticed in another message you brought up MajorBBS.... oh man that
was a blast. I was also a huge fan of TBBS and Searchlight. But
Wildcat? Mehhhhhh.... all that yellow-and-white gave me headaches,
lol.
why don't you take a look for yourself... the tools are available...
FWIW: most of my work and contributions were in tickit.js and
tickitcfg.js but i also provided a series of patches to clean up the dosemu setup routine and execution... other than that, i have provided
a bit of input here and there on other parts of synchronet... input
that was used to further the capabilities of sbbs on the FTN side of
the fence...
Try Valhalla - bbs.valhallabbs.com:24 - C.G. Learn run a nice
GAP-BBS system.
I get:
atdt bbs.valhallabbs.com:24
NO CARRIER
Then your system is mis-configured. Works fine for me.
No matter how much people try to mod their Synchronet BBS, they
cannot get rid of the Synchronet smell.
If you hate Synchronet so much, why do you post from the Synchronet author's BBS? LOL
Try Valhalla - bbs.valhallabbs.com:24 - C.G. Learn run a nice
GAP-BBS system.
I get:
atdt bbs.valhallabbs.com:24
NO CARRIER
Working fine here:
Updating JavaScript is like changing an extension in PPL, IPL,
MEX, wcCode etc.
I am talking about modifying core code.
Did you at least run a build ?
I always wanted to try TBBS. A few days ago I was searching for TBBS manual and found a dropbox archive that contained everything:
Marceline Jones wrote to DAN CLOUGH <=-
Try Valhalla - bbs.valhallabbs.com:24 - C.G. Learn run a nice
GAP-BBS system.
I get:
atdt bbs.valhallabbs.com:24
NO CARRIER
Then your system is mis-configured. Works fine for me.
You sound like a jumping to wrong conclusions expert.
Marceline Jones wrote to DAN CLOUGH <=-
No matter how much people try to mod their Synchronet BBS, they
cannot get rid of the Synchronet smell.
If you hate Synchronet so much, why do you post from the Synchronet author's BBS? LOL
Because Vertrauen grants full access on the first call, which is
better than BBS's that have stupid limits eg. low online time per
day, do not verify their users and allow posting privileges
within 24 hrs, or ask for people's phone numbers and introductory messages.
Do you run a BBS with stupid restrictions and rules ?
I heard Renegade was a WWIV clone. That is why I avoid it.
I am interested in BBS software that possess notable cultural, historical a feature differences. Maximus and RemoteAccess went head to head for a while
w00t !
Because Vertrauen grants full access on the first call, which is better tha BBS's that have stupid limits eg. low online time per day, do not verify th users and allow posting privileges within 24 hrs, or ask for people's phone numbers and introductory messages.
Try Valhalla - bbs.valhallabbs.com:24 - C.G. Learn run a nice
GAP-BBS system.
I get:
atdt bbs.valhallabbs.com:24
NO CARRIER
Working fine here:
It was down when I called it.
Do you run a BBS with stupid restrictions and rules ?
No, but I do run a BBS. Do you?
I get:
atdt bbs.valhallabbs.com:24
NO CARRIER
Then your system is mis-configured. Works fine for me.
You sound like a jumping to wrong conclusions expert.
Nope. Works properly here, and for multiple other people. It's just
you that has problems. Hmmmm.... where does the trouble exist?
Re: Re: Your BBS
By: Marceline Jones to MARK LEWIS on Sun Mar 14 2021 16:54:00
Updating JavaScript is like changing an extension in PPL, IPL,
MEX, wcCode etc.
no it isn't... you're ignorance is showing...
I am talking about modifying core code.
core code of what?
Did you at least run a build ?
build of what?
I heard Renegade was a WWIV clone. That is why I avoid it.
Good reason to not look at it. Thats the dumbest thing I ever heard
of.
I am interested in BBS software that possess notable cultural, historical a
feature differences. Maximus and RemoteAccess went head to head for a while
You mean like almost EVERY BBS in the 90s was running it? You could
do (AND STILL CAN!), do anything to it. http://www.rgbbs.info for
a qucik download.
Do you have a copy of the VHS installation videos for it? :) I do...
You need either Tipx or this other program written by some guy from
the website that passes a telnet connection from a Windows computer to Tipx. I forget which one.
The manuals for TBBS and especially Tims are crucial. There is no
freaking way you can get Fido working with Tims unless you had the manuals. You also need Flame as the tosser. TBBS really only works
with Tims/Flame.
I wrote a couple utilities for TBBS which one was used by a very large Fido hub in the 90's. John Souvestre was his name... he went off and
ran a large ISP somewhere down south.
Because Vertrauen grants full access on the first call, which is better tha
BBS's that have stupid limits eg. low online time per day, do not verify th
users and allow posting privileges within 24 hrs, or ask for people's phone
numbers and introductory messages.
I have full access on first call ... just need real name, and real birthday (for doors and adult areas -- msgs, doors). ttb.rgbbs.info
Try Valhalla - bbs.valhallabbs.com:24 - C.G. Learn run a nice
GAP-BBS system.
I get:
atdt bbs.valhallabbs.com:24
NO CARRIER
Working fine here:
It was down when I called it.
Maintenance or ip filtering, maybe. Try again - is a nice GAP system.
Do you have a copy of the VHS installation videos for it? :) I do...
I saw some videos on Internet Archive and YouTube basically selling TBBS as the best thing since sliced bread.
I wrote a couple utilities for TBBS which one was used by a very large Fido hub in the 90's. John Souvestre was his name... he went off and ran a large ISP somewhere down south.
Did you make any money ?
I get:
atdt bbs.valhallabbs.com:24
NO CARRIER
Australian BBS Listing
WWIV -> Telegard -> Renegade.
What makes you think they will give you their real details anyway ? and how would you verify it ?
That is already too much personal identifiable information. In some places people can obtain your medical history and birth certificate with just that
No, but I do run a BBS. Do you?
Yes.
Didnt know you were in a 3rd world country.
No, but I do run a BBS. Do you?
Yes.
Well it's funny, you post all this nonsense bullcrap from 1990 about software, yet you aren't a fidonet node, don't list your bbs, and 10 to
1 if you run one, I'd say it's a synchronet board that isn't even configured past default.
So, put up or shut up.
Australian BBS Listing
Holy shit! Where did you have to dig to find this obsecure bullshit.
Try North America where most of the BBSing took place. Would tell a 1000% different story in 1996.
I get:
atdt bbs.valhallabbs.com:24
NO CARRIER
Since this is my BBS you are takling about, what is going on. That is
a valid address to telnet into my GAP BBS. What client are you using,
may I suggest using a quality client like Syncterm or ZOC, that
renders the ansi correctly. I'm not understanding why you are using a dialup command to log into a telnet bbs. I have callers logging into my
3 systems everyday of the week, with no issues, so I have to assume
the problem lies on your end with the client software you are using,
or the setup of that software. Give me some info, and I will try to
help.
Holy shit! Where did you have to dig to find this obsecure bullshit. Try North America where most of the BBSing took place. Would tell a 1000% different story in 1996.
Where is the comparable data set for US BBS listings ? (usbbs.org has no files).
Where is the comparable data set for US BBS listings ? (usbbs.org has no files).
I love how she like Renegade was not the most widely used BBS software in 9 in North America ....
Holy shit! Where did you have to dig to find this obsecure bullshit. Try North America where most of the BBSing took place. Would tell a 1000% different story in 1996.
Where is the comparable data set for US BBS listings ? (usbbs.org has no files).
Marceline Jones wrote to T.J. MCMILLEN <=-
No, but I do run a BBS. Do you?
Yes.
Well it's funny, you post all this nonsense bullcrap from 1990 about software, yet you aren't a fidonet node, don't list your bbs, and 10 to
1 if you run one, I'd say it's a synchronet board that isn't even configured past default.
So, put up or shut up.
Your claim that Renegade was used prolifically and that FrontDoor
is just a mailer that has nothing to do with BBS software have
been debunked. Then you resort to fallacious tactics to discredit
my statements by implying that I am unqualified, rather than use
evidence to substantiate your claims. You should be ashamed of
yourself.
Marceline Jones wrote to C.G. LEARN <=-
I get:
atdt bbs.valhallabbs.com:24
NO CARRIER
Since this is my BBS you are takling about, what is going on. That is
a valid address to telnet into my GAP BBS. What client are you using,
may I suggest using a quality client like Syncterm or ZOC, that
renders the ansi correctly. I'm not understanding why you are using a dialup command to log into a telnet bbs. I have callers logging into my
3 systems everyday of the week, with no issues, so I have to assume
the problem lies on your end with the client software you are using,
or the setup of that software. Give me some info, and I will try to
help.
Your BBS rejects calls from all analog modem terminal programs as
port scans (eg. Telix, Terminate, Qmodem, Procomm etc). The only
client that works is SyncTerm.
Besides, you have denied my access:
.==============================================================.
I MARCELINE JONES I
I I
I I am sorry to inform you that access to Valhalla II BBS is I
I being denied to you because of unacceptable behavior! The I
I most common causes for being LOCKED OUT of this system are I
I 1. Fake Phone Number or Address Information. We asked you I
I to be honest when you created the account. We try to I
I keep accurate information on all of our members. Nobody I
I will see this info but me! I
I 2. Flaming, uploading non shareware type files, files that I
I contain virii, threating or misleading conduct to anothe I
I member of this system, allowing your account to be used I
I by anyone other than yourself, Etc.... I
I If you feel that this is an error, or you wish to send me I
I the correct info to gain access, you can contact me by: I
I 1. Writing a letter to this address: C.G. Learn I
I 3907 Beechmont Rd. I
I Richmond, Va. 23235 I
I 2. Sending an Email to: ValhallaHomeServices@comcast.net I `=============================================================='
Your BBS rejects calls from all analog modem terminal programs as port sca (eg. Telix, Terminate, Qmodem, Procomm etc). The only client that works is SyncTerm.
Besides, you have denied my access:
║ I am sorry to inform you that access to Valhalla II BBS is ║
║ being denied to you because of unacceptable behavior! The ║
║ most common causes for being LOCKED OUT of this system are ║
║ 1. Fake Phone Number or Address Information. We asked you ║
║ to be honest when you created the account. We try to ║
║ keep accurate information on all of our members. Nobody ║
║ will see this info but me! ║
If you are a sysop yourself, and I'm guessing you are, as you have
access to this echo,
If you are a sysop yourself, and I'm guessing you are, as you have access to this echo,
Wrong guess. It is a gate crasher.
You want to see a unique system ? then use software that nobody
else is using.
Like Concord maybe?
Distraction and deflection. Standard tactics from a bullshitter.
You were asked (more than once) to state your BBS's address. You have failed to do so. Therefore the logical conclusion is that you do not
run a BBS. Prove otherwise or continue to be laughed at.
Hahahahahahahahahaha! Perfect. Karma at work.
Telex, Terminate, Qmodem, and Procom are far from telnet clients. Syncterm worked as it is a telnet client. I have updated the Net2bbs
front end to the newest version, so you should not have problems. If
you want, you can also visit my website at bbs.valhallabbs.com, and I
have set up ftelnet to each one of my systems for people that don't
have the correct clients, or you can log into my sbbs system by
telnet, and choose option 2 or 3, and be ported to my gap or ra bbs.
This is an old style bbs, and the opening screen with the rules and
regs asked you to give true and honest info, and that only the sysop
sees this info, Here is the info you entered. I hardly call that true info.
Address 1 : 1 ADDRESS
Address 2 : STREET
Home Phone : (123)456-7890
Work Phone : (123)456-7890
Rules are in place on most BBS system, set up by the sysop. If you
can't follow the rules, most sysops will lock you out as well. If you
are a sysop yourself, and I'm guessing you are, as you have access to this echo, I'm sure you have rules in place on your system also. It's real simple, if you don't like the rules, drop carrier and find
another system. Not all of my systems are this rigid. Above all,
relax, have fun, and play fair.
Your BBS is still rejecting calls from Telix, Terminate, Qmodem and Procomm as portscans. Did you test your change ?
Marceline Jones wrote to C.G. LEARN <=-
Telex, Terminate, Qmodem, and Procom are far from telnet clients.
Syncterm worked as it is a telnet client. I have updated the Net2bbs
front end to the newest version, so you should not have problems. If
you want, you can also visit my website at bbs.valhallabbs.com, and I
have set up ftelnet to each one of my systems for people that don't
have the correct clients, or you can log into my sbbs system by
telnet, and choose option 2 or 3, and be ported to my gap or ra bbs.
Your BBS is still rejecting calls from Telix, Terminate, Qmodem
and Procomm as portscans. Did you test your change ?
This is an old style bbs, and the opening screen with the rules and
regs asked you to give true and honest info, and that only the sysop
sees this info, Here is the info you entered. I hardly call that true info.
Address 1 : 1 ADDRESS
Address 2 : STREET
Home Phone : (123)456-7890
Work Phone : (123)456-7890
So you reviewed my application and made a conscious decision to
reject it on the basis that false details were provided.
What
were you thinking ? that someone would hand over their real name,
date of birth, address and contact phone numbers - are you
serious ? You should ask for their social security number too.
Rules are in place on most BBS system, set up by the sysop. If you
can't follow the rules, most sysops will lock you out as well. If you
are a sysop yourself, and I'm guessing you are, as you have access to this echo, I'm sure you have rules in place on your system also. It's real simple, if you don't like the rules, drop carrier and find
another system. Not all of my systems are this rigid. Above all,
relax, have fun, and play fair.
I can appreciate leaving old questionnaires intact to showcase an authentic BBS artefact. You run it however you want, but
expecting and enforcing true and honest personally identifiable information rules, especially in this day and age when online
security and identity theft are widespread issues, is
particularly retarded and worthy of derision.
Your BBS is still rejecting calls from Telix, Terminate, Qmodem and Procomm as portscans. Did you test your change ?
So you reviewed my application and made a conscious decision to reject it on the basis that false details were provided. What were you thinking ? that someone would hand over their real name, date of birth, address and contact phone numbers - are you serious ? You should ask for their social security number too.
A sysop runs their own board the way they want to. If you don't like that, don't call it. Simple concept, eh?
A sysop runs their own board the way they want to. If you don't
like that, don't call it. Simple concept, eh?
Some people in USA believe that being banned from a private
social network is a violation of their first amendment and call
it "cancel culture".
Your BBS is still rejecting calls from Telix, Terminate, Qmodem and Procomm as portscans. Did you test your change ?
these are NOT telnet clients. they never will be. go read the telnet RFC. then >hink about what you keep doing.
Marceline. I want to appoligize to you for the language I used on the
last message. My temper got the best of me. I don't use that type of language with ladies.
Mike Powell wrote to ALEXANDER GROTEWOHL <=-
Your BBS is still rejecting calls from Telix, Terminate, Qmodem and Procomm as portscans. Did you test your change ?
these are NOT telnet clients. they never will be. go read the telnet RFC. then
hink about what you keep doing.
That depends on what OS you are using and what your setup is.
Under OS/2, if you are using VMODEM, some/all of those make good
BBS telnet clients.
If you are running Windows or linux, they are much less likely to
be effective at telneting to BBSes at all.
Sexist bastard! Ladies have as much right to be sworn at as gentlemen.
Sexist bastard! Ladies have as much right to be sworn at as gentlemen.
mark lewis wrote to Bj÷rn Felten <=-
"some people think that wind turbines exist to cool down the earth by acting like giant fans."
Anyone knows they're there to speed up the Earth's rotation.
If you are running Windows or linux, they are much less likely toI use Telix just fine, under Linux (and DosBox) to telnet to BBSes.
be effective at telneting to BBSes at all.
mark lewis wrote to Bj÷rn Felten <=-
"some people think that wind turbines exist to cool down the earth by
acting like giant fans."
Anyone knows they're there to speed up the Earth's rotation.
... Do the last thing first
--- MultiMail/DOS v0.52
* Origin: http://realitycheckbbs.org | tomorrow's retro tech
(1:218/700)
Alexander Grotewohl wrote to Dan Clough <=-
If you are running Windows or linux, they are much less likely to
be effective at telneting to BBSes at all.
I use Telix just fine, under Linux (and DosBox) to telnet to BBSes.
every time you connect to a bbs do you see maybe 5 or 6 random
characters display on the screen before the bbs author name and
other info displays?
those are meant to be a handshake.. that your client responds to
to determine the features of your client, and to determine how
the telnet server should behave.
what you're doing is having a bit of luck. since your client
behaves like the telnet server is going to behave by default.
now if i decide to base your eligibility to use my bbs on whether
your client is an actual telnet client (where often, bots that
try every password in the books are NOT) .. because your client
isn't responding to those 'handshakes' .. that's not my problem
but yours. i believe it's reasonable thinking so.
i'd be curious to see if VMODEM behaves as the middle-man and
correctly answers those 'handshakes' on your behalf. in which
case sure, you would look sufficiently like a telnet client to
bypass the check.
Mauro Veiga wrote to Ward Dossche <=-
For a long time ... a veeeery long time, I was the only D'bridge
addict in Fidonet.
And I'm the only one using the INDIGO Point software in Fidonet.
:-)
No. I see CONNECT 57600 briefly, and then the BBS.
Well, no, it's not "luck". The client (just tested with both Telix and ProComm under DosBox/Linux) is configured as an "ANSI-BBS" terminal, and that's what the BBS sees it as. Right there in the logs.
Alexander Grotewohl wrote to Dan Clough <=-
No. I see CONNECT 57600 briefly, and then the BBS.
so.. another bit of software in providing you with a CONNECT
message. and also handling the telnet handshake and acting as an intermediary.
you no longer fit the criteria i was describing because you are
emulating a telnet terminal. one half with your term and one half
with whichever software is responding to ATNET1
Well, no, it's not "luck". The client (just tested with both Telix and ProComm under DosBox/Linux) is configured as an "ANSI-BBS" terminal, and that's what the BBS sees it as. Right there in the logs.
i'm sorry, but you don't understand what's going on behind the
scenes for that to "just work" ..
Quoting Flavio Bessa to Mauro Veiga <=-
For a long time ... a veeeery long time, I was the only D'bridge
addict in Fidonet.
And I'm the only one using the INDIGO Point software in Fidonet.
:-)
Don't count with it. If all goes OK, indigo will become mainstream
in Brazil pretty soon :)
Morgul wrote to Kurt Weiske <=-
Or did you think Daylight Savings Time was just a numbers game? Nope, they actually adjust the Earth's rotation to achieve it, silly!
Sexist bastard! Ladies have as much right to be sworn at as gentlemen.
Or did you think Daylight Savings Time was just a numbers game? Nope, they actually adjust the Earth's rotation to achieve it, silly!
A quick check of the dictionary shows me that "a lady" is the wife/daughter of "a lord".
Do we have any lords in here?
A quick check of the dictionary shows me that "a lady" is the
wife/daughter of "a lord".
Do we have any lords in here?
Your BBS is still rejecting calls from Telix, Terminate, Qmodem and Procomm as portscans. Did you test your change ?
these are NOT telnet clients. they never will be. go read the telnet RFC. t >hink about what you keep doing.
That depends on what OS you are using and what your setup is. Under OS/2, if you are using VMODEM, some/all of those make good BBS telnet clients.
If you are running Windows or linux, they are much less likely to be effective at telneting to BBSes at all.
Mike
* SLMR 2.1a * MANIAC - An early computer built by nuts.
So you reviewed my application and made a conscious decision to reject it on the basis that false details were provided. What were you thinking ? that someone would hand over their real name, date of birth, address and contact phone numbers - are you serious ? You should ask for their social security number too.
Rules are in place on most BBS system, set up by the sysop. If you can't follow the rules, most sysops will lock you out as well. If you are a sysop yourself, and I'm guessing you are, as you have accessto
this echo, I'm sure you have rules in place on your system also.It's
real simple, if you don't like the rules, drop carrier and find another system. Not all of my systems are this rigid. Above all, relax, have fun, and play fair.
I can appreciate leaving old questionnaires intact to showcase an
authentic BBS artefact. You run it however you want, but expecting and enforcing true and honest personally identifiable information rules, especially in this day and age when online security and identity theft are widespread issues, is particularly retarded and worthy of derision.
I think your overreacting. By the way you can not post messages in the Fidonet Echoes using a alias name..
T.J. Mcmillen wrote to Marceline Jones <=-that
That is already too much personal identifiable information. In some places people can obtain your medical history and birth certificate with just
Didnt know you were in a 3rd world country.
Holy shit! Where did you have to dig to find this obsecure bullshit. Try North America where most of the BBSing took place. Would tell a 1000% different story in 1996.
Where is the comparable data set for US BBS listings ? (usbbs.org has no files).
Mauro Veiga wrote to Ward Dossche <=-
For a long time ... a veeeery long time, I was the only D'bridge
addict in Fidonet.
And I'm the only one using the INDIGO Point software in Fidonet.
:-)
Mauro Veiga wrote to Nighthawk <=-
And I'm the only one using the INDIGO Point software in Fidonet.
:-)
Don't count with it. If all goes OK, indigo will become mainstream
in Brazil pretty soon :)
Peter Karlson will be happy. :-))
Peter Karlson will be happy. :-))
Let's see how it goes.
Sysop: | Eric Oulashin |
---|---|
Location: | Beaverton, Oregon, USA |
Users: | 105 |
Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
Uptime: | 01:27:12 |
Calls: | 5,884 |
Calls today: | 3 |
Files: | 8,496 |
D/L today: |
74 files (11,115K bytes) |
Messages: | 344,554 |
Posted today: | 3 |