The FBI did not look into CIA information during 2016 that suggested that a certain (D) Presidential campaign was planning to misinform the public by spreading a rumor that their (R) opponent's campaign was working with Russia.
Trump (even then) wanted dirt on his political opponent, Joe Biden.
Trump wanted dirt on his political opponent.
Biden wanted to get rid of a foreign political opponent who was hassling
the company his son worked for.
The FD-1023 is not evidence.
The testimony recorded on it is.
On 06-21-23 15:48, Mike Powell <=-
spoke to Dale Shipp about Re: Bringing a knife to <=-
MP> alkingEither way, I suspect that Ron's approach... don't even bother
to him... is probably best. My only worry is that someone will read his nonsense, assume it is informed, and use it to form opinions.
You are stating an opinion that I formed a long time ago -- probably before he dropped his last name from his postings.
Alan Ianson has not dropped his last name in this echo, although he
has in others.
I was talking about Ron, not Alan.
Why would Ron's approach that is probably best be not talking to
himself?
yeah they did but only after a threat from Joe Biden that they wouldn't get the Billion Dollars, but why? The prosecutor was investigating Burisma Gas Corporation, that his son Hunter was on the board of.Trump (even then) wanted dirt on his political opponent, Joe Biden.
Trump wanted dirt on his political opponent.
Yes.
Biden wanted to get rid of a foreign political opponent who was hassling the company his son worked for.
It was Ukraine who fired that corrupt prosecutor.
It was Ukraine who fired that corrupt prosecutor.yeah they did but only after a threat from Joe Biden that they wouldn't get th
Billion Dollars, but why? The prosecutor was investigating Burisma Gas Corporation, that his son Hunter was on the board of.
(You left that small important detail out)
Russian collusion is/was not a hoax.
Says the man who very recently claimed he NEVER claimed in this echo that Russian collusion was real?
"exonerate(s) Donald Trump" = his campaign did not collude with the Russians. Therefore, Russian collusion with the 2016 Trump campaign is a hoax perpetuated by the sore losers on the other side.
As you have previously shown at least some knowledge of what a 1023 is,you
know it didn't "come from Rudy."
It did come from Rudy but I don't think Rudy's involvement is an importantet
l, or is it?
An FD-1023 is not evidence of a crime. It is a claim someone made.
It is a claim made by an unknown source.
The FBI did not look into CIA information during 2016 that suggested that a
certain (D) Presidential campaign was planning to misinform the public by
spreading a rumor that their (R) opponent's campaign was working with
Russia.
I just don't believe your narrative.
The FD-1023 is not evidence.
The testimony recorded on it is.
Trump (even then) wanted dirt on his political opponent, Joe Biden.
Trump wanted dirt on his political opponent.
Alan Ianson has not dropped his last name in this echo, although he
has in others.
I was talking about Ron, not Alan.
Why would Ron's approach that is probably best be not talking to himself?
The FBI did not look into CIA information during 2016 that suggested that a
certain (D) Presidential campaign was planning to misinform the public by spreading a rumor that their (R) opponent's campaign was working with Russia.
heAlan Ianson has not dropped his last name in this echo, although
has in others.
I was talking about Ron, not Alan.
Why would Ron's approach that is probably best be not talking to
himself?
I read that as "don't even bother talking to him" meaning talking to
Ron. He rarely responds, and even if he does it is not responsive.
ussiaThe FBI did not look into CIA information during 2016 that suggested that a certain (D) Presidential campaign was planning to misinform the public by spreading a rumor that their (R) opponent's campaign was working with
I just don't believe your narrative.
Biden wanted to get rid of a foreign political opponent who was hassling the company his son worked for.
It was Ukraine who fired that corrupt prosecutor.
I read that as "don't even bother talking to him" meaning talking to
Ron. He rarely responds, and even if he does it is not responsive.
hIt was Ukraine who fired that corrupt prosecutor.yeah they did but only after a threat from Joe Biden that they wouldn't get
Billion Dollars, but why? The prosecutor was investigating Burisma Gasorpora
on, that his son Hunter was on the board of.
(You left that small important detail out)
Biden wanted to get rid of a foreign political opponent who was hassling >> > the company his son worked for.
It was Ukraine who fired that corrupt prosecutor.
Because they were told, by VP Biden, that they'd not get the promised money unless they did him a favor first. Because Obama also wanted that favor doesn't make any difference.
He undoubtedly believes that is only a coincidence. <rollseyes>
Mike Powell wrote to DALE SHIPP <=-
I read that as "don't even bother talking to him" meaning talking to
Ron. He rarely responds, and even if he does it is not responsive.
He usually responds to me, even if we don't always agree.
I don't respond to Dale because he has nothing worth reading.
| Sysop: | Eric Oulashin |
|---|---|
| Location: | Beaverton, Oregon, USA |
| Users: | 102 |
| Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
| Uptime: | 06:34:12 |
| Calls: | 3,521 |
| Calls today: | 3 |
| Files: | 8,461 |
| Messages: | 337,985 |