And I was right. New York City Mayor Eric Adams announced that 25 sheltersil
be closing (he says "due to a lower number of migrants") in NYC, Albany, Buffalo, and Poughkeepsie (we know the real reason.)
And I was right. New York City Mayor Eric Adams announced that 25 shelteil
be closing (he says "due to a lower number of migrants") in NYC, Albany, Buffalo, and Poughkeepsie (we know the real reason.)
What authority does the NYC mayor have to close anything in Albany, Buffalo, or Poughkeepsie? My guess is that he may be announcing it, but that someone else is closing those.
Adams has actually come out as one of the ones who seems to have an understanding of there being a problem, which is why the Dems turned on him.
Adams has actually come out as one of the ones who seems to have an understanding of there being a problem, which is why the Dems turned on him.
Adams doesn't know how to maintain a poker face. They'll always dislike that about him, but his new narrative that "we don't need these hotels anymore because there's less migrants now" shows how deceptive he is.
My possible misunderstanding is that, since Trump got elected, numbers
are going down.
I read an article about what Adams said regarding a particular
shelter in the NYC area. I cannot say about all of them, but it is not slated to close until March or April of 2025. By then Trump will be in office and, presuming he keeps his campaign promises, we should indeed have "less migrants now" by then.
I read an article about what Adams said regarding a particular
shelter in the NYC area. I cannot say about all of them, but it is not slated to close until March or April of 2025. By then Trump will be in office and, presuming he keeps his campaign promises, we should indeed have "less migrants now" by then.
It sounds true that less migrants may still be en route, but the unexplained part of this is "how does that make those already here not need housing anymore?"
It sounds true that less migrants may still be en route, but the unexpla part of this is "how does that make those already here not need housing anymore?"
They may have housed them.
They may have shipped them off to some other city (like Springfield).
They may have gone home or been deported.
In the article I read, it sounded like Adams is trying to work with authorities (unlike some of his D counterparts) and actually get some people sent back.
Aaron Thomas wrote to Mike Powell <=-
It sounds true that less migrants may still be en route, but the unexplained part of this is "how does that make those already here not need housing anymore?"
on'tThey may have housed them.
They may have shipped them off to some other city (like Springfield). They may have gone home or been deported.
In the article I read, it sounded like Adams is trying to work with authorities (unlike some of his D counterparts) and actually get some people sent back.
I want Eric Adams to be right, and I want that news to be correct, but I
believe any of it.
It sounds true that less migrants may still be en route, but the unexplained part of this is "how does that make those already here not need housing anymore?"
This is a known tactic. Make chaos. Then the people will demand that the gov't step in to make us safe. Of course, the gov't needs more power/money/etc. in order to do that.
It sounds true that less migrants may still be en route, but the unexplained part of this is "how does that make those already here no need housing anymore?"
This is a known tactic. Make chaos. Then the people will demand that
the gov't step in to make us safe. Of course, the gov't needs more power/money/etc. in order to do that.
Aaron Thomas wrote to Dr. What <=-
If they ever expected Kamala to win the election, then that was
definitely part of their plan. "We need trillions of dollars for the illegal migrants and it would be <insert big words here> if you don't agree with me on this."
No one expected the Ho to win. Even her internal polling showed she was losing bad.
IHMO: The Elitists did what they do best: Distract. While they covered
up their bodies, destroyed evidence and try to mess up everyhing as much as possible so that Trump would have to spend most of his next 4 years just cleaning their messes up.
Aaron Thomas wrote to Dr. What <=-
It was a test of our smarts.
Had the ho won, then the world elite would
have gotten away with at least another 3 trillion+ dollars of our money over the next 4 years.
All that talk about "diversity" and "equity" over the Biden years was preparatory brainwashing,
and it failed bigtime when we elected our convicted-rapist/hero.
They thought they were tricking us into voting for Kamala.
The Democrats need a guy like Trump to clean up once in a while.
Otherwise there won't be enough of our money for them to steal 4 years later.
Sysop: | Eric Oulashin |
---|---|
Location: | Beaverton, Oregon, USA |
Users: | 99 |
Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
Uptime: | 04:38:34 |
Calls: | 5,306 |
Calls today: | 13 |
Files: | 8,493 |
D/L today: |
58 files (23,927K bytes) |
Messages: | 355,695 |
Posted today: | 2 |