Any ideas? Is '1' not a valid QWK number? I have other areas in the
same ini file with single-digit numbers.
apam wrote to Blue White <=-
Area 1 is used for private email, I had meant to reserve it in the past for when I did implement email in qwk, but forgot to, so when I put private email i had to reserve it.
Any other one digit number should work just fine.
apam wrote to Blue White <=-
Area 1 is used for private email, I had meant to reserve it in the past for when I did implement email in qwk, but forgot to, so when I put private email i had to reserve it.
Any other one digit number should work just fine.
Thanks. I think that other BBS systems, like synchronet, use 0 for the private email QWK number so I did not think of that being an issue.
Glad I asked. :)
apam wrote to Blue White <=-
Area 1 is used for private email, I had meant to reserve it in the past for when I did implement email in qwk, but forgot to, so when I put private email i had to reserve it.
Any other one digit number should work just fine.
Thanks. I think that other BBS systems, like synchronet, use 0 for the private email QWK number so I did not think of that being an issue.
Glad I asked. :)
Oh? Hmm, maybe that's why I hadn't reserved 1 in the past. I thought
they used 1 perhaps I can change it to 0.
apam wrote to Blue White <=-
I've just pushed some fixes to use conference 0 instead of 1 for
email.. you should be able to use conference 1 again.
apam wrote to Blue White <=-
I've just pushed some fixes to use conference 0 instead of 1 for
email.. you should be able to use conference 1 again.
Sysop: | Eric Oulashin |
---|---|
Location: | Beaverton, Oregon, USA |
Users: | 101 |
Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
Uptime: | 05:21:50 |
Calls: | 3,429 |
Calls today: | 3 |
Files: | 8,461 |
Messages: | 336,666 |