I also have port 24553 set up if anyone would like to try to use
BINKPS.
If you like you can send stuff to my binkps port, 24553. I have not
heard of anyone having a successfull poll or not aside from 1 link using binkd so I'm not sure that will work.
12:43:41 Poll BINKP node via address lookup: 21:4/106
12:43:41 1-Polling 21:4/106 on slot 1 via BINKP
12:43:41 1-Connecting to trmb.ca on port 24553
12:43:42 1-Connected by IPV4 SSL to 172.105.21.200
12:43:42 1-System The Rusty MailBox
12:43:42 1-SysOp Alan Ianson
12:43:42 1-Location Penticton, BC Canada
12:43:42 1-Info NDL 115200,CM,XW,IBN
12:43:42 1-Info TIME Sun, 1 Mar 2020 11:43:40 -0800
12:43:42 1-Mailer binkd/1.1a-101/Linux binkp/1.1
12:43:42 1-Info TRF 0 0
12:43:42 1-Session ended (0 sent, 0 rcvd, 0 skip)
12:43:43 Polled 1 systems
Looks like it worked from this end. :)
If I'm not mistaken we have binkps working between us. :)
If I'm not mistaken we have binkps working between us. :)
It sure looks like it. I am also able to use binkds between hub 4 and
hubs 1 and 3. Hub 2 is getting an unable to connect yet...
If I'm not mistaken we have binkps working between us. :)
It sure looks like it. I am also able to use binkds between hub 4 and
hubs 1 and 3. Hub 2 is getting an unable to connect yet...
If I'm not mistaken we have binkps working between us. :)
How cool is that :)
It did! We are good to go for binkps. Real headway. :)
+ 01 Mar 11:50:32 [2195] External command 'openssl s_client -quiet -alpn binkp -cipher ALL:@SECLEVEL=0 -connect bbs.castlerockbbs.com:24553'
I have found with binkd adding -cipher ALL:@SECLEVEL=1 works well. I see no difference between a binkp or binkps poll. SECLEVEL=0 succeeds also
but it takes time to negotiate. SECLEVEL=2 fails.
It sure looks like it. I am also able to use binkds between hub 4 and hubs 1 and 3. Hub 2 is getting an unable to connect yet...
Are you using MIS POLL SEND now Dan for mailin / mailout? It's fast.
This sounds about right. SECLEVEL=1 means 1024 bit key minimum which Mystic used (and now uses 2048 assuming it doesn't create issues). If
I also have port 24553 set up if anyone would like to try to use BINKPS.
Does that mean that the very very latest prealpha (probably later than
the one I installed yesterday morning) auto-creates a 2048-bit SSL key/certificate if I would shutdown MIS, remove data/ssl.ssl.cert, and relaunch MIS?
Hello Avon,
If I'm not mistaken we have binkps working between us. :)
How cool is that :)
+----------Coolness-O-Meter----------+
| Meh | Uh Huh | OK | Sure | Whammo! |
+------------------------------------+
| | | | | XXXXX |
+------------------------------------+
I think we are in a pretty good place now and getting better as we
go. :)
Good start, but there is room for much more coolness. Using obsoleted encryption is kind of uncool ;).
Me and my fidonet uplink are using binkps with TLS 1.3 for quite some
time now. Beat that! :-P
I hope all the binkps implementations will be compatible to each other
and using recent TLS standards at some point.
Does that mean that the very very latest prealpha (probably later tha the one I installed yesterday morning) auto-creates a 2048-bit SSL key/certificate if I would shutdown MIS, remove data/ssl.ssl.cert, an relaunch MIS?
Yes, this exactly.
I don't know if I have uploaded a prealpha build since I made that
change, but I am about to upload a new build for testing and it will be
in that build. If you delete the ssl.cert it will recreate one that should be 2048 bit.
--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A46 2020/03/01 (Windows/64)
Sysop: | Eric Oulashin |
---|---|
Location: | Beaverton, Oregon, USA |
Users: | 95 |
Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
Uptime: | 01:30:02 |
Calls: | 4,646 |
Calls today: | 9 |
Files: | 8,491 |
Messages: | 348,696 |
Posted today: | 1 |