I have reviewed everything and fixed an issue. Surprisingly nothing was wrong with the logic, it was just set up in a way that it only processed the HOLD logic if they were also expiring for days of inactivity. Fixed!
+ Mar 06 20:39:27 Process: Echo Node Tracker
+ Mar 06 20:39:27 Setting mail to Hold for ID 36 (21:1/129)
+ Mar 06 20:39:27 Setting filebox to Hold for ID 36 (21:1/129)
+ Mar 06 20:39:27 Setting mail to Hold for ID 91 (21:1/182)
+ Mar 06 20:39:27 Setting filebox to Hold for ID 91 (21:1/182)
+ Mar 06 20:39:27 Setting mail to Hold for ID 123 (21:1/205)
+ Mar 06 20:39:27 Setting filebox to Hold for ID 123 (21:1/205)
+ Mar 06 20:39:27 Results: 0 Reset, 0 Disabled, 3 Hold in 0.05s
I have reviewed everything and fixed an issue. Surprisingly nothing was wrong with the logic, it was just set up in a way that it only processed the HOLD logic if they were also expiring for days of inactivity. Fixed!
Do you think when a rule is met a line in the log could state what was TRUE to cause the changed setting to be applied?
A suggestion would be to delink the echomail areas and file bases from
the nodes being made inactive as part of this process.
I have added a print out that shows the number of attempts made and the number of days they were unreachable. The other operations do give more
Setting mail to Hold for 21:1/1 (21 crash errors, 7 days unreachable)
A suggestion would be to delink the echomail areas and file bases fro the nodes being made inactive as part of this process.
I think if I do that I think I'd like to make it optional. I like the idea of being able to reactivate someone and they can pick up right
where they left off without having to sort out what they were subscribed to.
Deleting them from the system does delink them (or should). I don't have access to my TODO list to add this right now but it should be added. Hopefully I won't forget (I am on the move at the moment)
Deleting them from the system does delink them (or should). I don't have access to my TODO list to add this right now but it should be added. Hopefully I won't forget (I am on the move at the moment)
Actually, I don't think it does. I was just looking at Hub 4 (Win 32) system, and when I look at the echomail exports from the message base,
I have added a print out that shows the number of attempts made and t number of days they were unreachable. The other operations do give m
Setting mail to Hold for 21:1/1 (21 crash errors, 7 days unreachabl
Thanks! Yes I think this hits the mark and will help understanding as to why.
I can see maybe something like what you're showing happening if a situation occurs where echomail is exporting at the same time you are trying to make adjustments to echomail nodes though.
| Sysop: | Eric Oulashin |
|---|---|
| Location: | Beaverton, Oregon, USA |
| Users: | 124 |
| Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
| Uptime: | 07:39:37 |
| Calls: | 7,808 |
| Calls today: | 12 |
| Files: | 9,388 |
| U/L today: |
1 files (340K bytes) |
| D/L today: |
2,399 files (1,203M bytes) |
| Messages: | 398,500 |
| Posted today: | 5 |