R:190707/2031Z @:LW3DBH.1744.BA.ARG.SA #:38928 [MORENO] FBB7.00i $:1363-LW1DSE R:190707/2022Z @:LU7DQP.#LAN.BA.ARG.SOAM #:2626 [Lanus Oeste] FBB7.00i
From: LW1DSE@LU7DQP.#LAN.BA.ARG.SOAM
To : TECH@KF5JRV.#NWAR.AR.USA.NA
[»»» TST HOST 1.43c, UTC diff:5, Local time: Sun Jul 07 13:01:19 2019 «««]
Watch enough movies in which aliens contact humans, and you'll notice >atrend: the people deciding how Earth should respond to the extraterrestrial >communications are usually politicians or scientists.
But the UK Seti Research Network (UKSRN) thinks the average persons would >have a say in how Earth responds if aliens ever decide to say "hello" to >humanity.
To that end, the group of UK academics active in the search for extraterres_ >trial intelligence launched a survey at the Royal Society's summer science >exhibition on Monday.
The survey's purpose? Figure out how the public thinks we should respondto >alien contact. "There is absolutely no procedure enshrined in international >law on how to respond to a signal from an alien civilization," astronomer >Martin Dominik told The Guardian. "We want to hear people's views. The >consequences affect more people than just scientists."
The survey, which the UKSRN believes will be the biggest of its kind, >includes such questions as "Do you think that it is worth searching for >extra-terrestrial intelligence?" and "Some people think we should send >messages into space even if we don't receive a message first. What is your >opinion?"
It also includes questions focused on the best way for experts to share >information on alien contact with the public, asking respondents what they >would consider a "credible source" an importantline ofquestioning if we
don't want the public to dismiss real contact withaliens as fake news.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In 2017, an asteroid came barreling past the Earth. That alone isn't
particu larly noteworthy, but this object was unlike any other. Not only >was it the first to hail from outside our solar system, but it also had a >weird shape and spin, plus it accelerated in an unexpected way while passing >the Sun. Astronomers dubbed the strange asteroid "Oumuamua, and soon, >speculations wirled that the object was sent by aliens" but a new study may >finallyput the extraterrestrial theory to bed.
On Monday, an international team of researchers published a new study
on Oumuamua in the journal Nature Astronomy. In it, they write that >they found "no compelling evidence to favour an alien explanation" for >the strange interstellar object. Oumuamua's properties are consistent with
a natural origin, "researcher Matthew Knight, an astronomer from the >University ofaryland, told Reuters, "and an alien explanation is unwarranted. >"Seems the asteroid would have needed to do something far moreout-of-the_ >-ordinary to convince the team it was sent by ET, with Knighttelling Reuters, >"Yes, if it made a sudden, unexplainable turn thatwould certainly have >warranted further exploration.
73, Scott kf5jrv
KF5JRV @ KF5JRV.#NWAR.AR.USA.NA
I ask: Whta if the extraterrestrials are actually communicating with us or trying to do, but we humans are unable to understand, decode or simply receive what they are saying to us?
R:190707/1019Z @:LU7DQP.#LAN.BA.ARG.SOAM #:2572 [Lanus Oeste] FBB7.00i R:190707/1018Z @:LU1DBQ.#MOR.BA.ARG.SOAM #:20835 [MORON] $:10176_KF5JRV R:190707/1018Z
28257@LU9DCE.TOR.BA.ARG.SOAM LinBPQ6.0.18
R:190707/1010Z
32577@N3HYM.MD.USA.NOAM BPQ6.0.18
R:190707/1015Z 10176@KF5JRV.#NWAR.AR.USA.NA BPQK6.0.18
Watch enough movies in which aliens contact humans, and you'll notice atrend: the people deciding how Earth should respond to the extraterrestrial communications are usually politicians or scientists.
But the UK Seti Research Network (UKSRN) thinks the average persons would have a say in how Earth responds if aliens ever decide to say "hello" to humanity.
To that end, the group of UK academics active in the search for extraterres_ trial intelligence launched a survey at the Royal Society's summer science exhibition on Monday.
The survey's purpose? Figure out how the public thinks we should respondto alien contact. "There is absolutely no procedure enshrined in international
law on how to respond to a signal from an alien civilization," astronomer Martin Dominik told The Guardian. "We want to hear people's views. The consequences affect more people than just scientists."
The survey, which the UKSRN believes will be the biggest of its kind, includes such questions as "Do you think that it is worth searching for extra-terrestrial intelligence?" and "Some people think we should send messages into space even if we don't receive a message first. What is your opinion?"
It also includes questions focused on the best way for experts to share information on alien contact with the public, asking respondents what they would consider a "credible source" an importantline ofquestioning if we
don't want the public to dismiss real contact withaliens as fake news.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In 2017, an asteroid came barreling past the Earth. That alone isn't particu larly noteworthy, but this object was unlike any other. Not only
was it the first to hail from outside our solar system, but it also had a weird shape and spin, plus it accelerated in an unexpected way while passing the Sun. Astronomers dubbed the strange asteroid "Oumuamua, and soon, speculations wirled that the object was sent by aliens" but a new study may finallyput the extraterrestrial theory to bed.
On Monday, an international team of researchers published a new study
on Oumuamua in the journal Nature Astronomy. In it, they write that they found "no compelling evidence to favour an alien explanation" for
the strange interstellar object. Oumuamua's properties are consistent with
a natural origin, "researcher Matthew Knight, an astronomer from the University ofaryland, told Reuters, "and an alien explanation is unwarranted. "Seems the asteroid would have needed to do something far moreout-of-the_ -ordinary to convince the team it was sent by ET, with Knighttelling Reuters, "Yes, if it made a sudden, unexplainable turn thatwould certainly have warranted further exploration.
73, Scott kf5jrv
KF5JRV @ KF5JRV.#NWAR.AR.USA.NA
I ask: Wahta if the extraterrestrials are actually communicating with us or trying to do, but we humans are unable to understand, decode or simply receive what they are saying to us?
╔════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╗ ║ Osvaldo F. Zappacosta. Barrio Garay (GF05tg) Alte. Brown, Bs As, Argentina.║ ║ Mother UMC µPC:AMD486@120MHz 32MbRAM HD SCSI 8.4Gb MSDOS 7.10 TSTHOST1.43C ║ ║ 6 celdas 2V 150AH. 18 paneles solares 10W. ║ ║
lw1dse@yahoo.com ;
lw1dse@gmail.com ║ ╚════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╝
--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A43 (Linux/32)
* Origin: HAMRADIO telnet lu9dce.dynu.com (21:5/101)